The Grizzlies are simply a different team without Ja

[AlternativeAcc.]

The Grizzlies really miss Ja offense and scoring late in games he gives Memphis a extra push if healthy this series goes 7 games.

Yeah bro them getting smoked by 40 with morant to go down 2-1 on the road painted a clear picture of a 7 game series

[PeroAntic]

Yeah bro them getting smoked by 40 with morant to go down 2-1 on the road painted a clear picture of a 7 game series

So how come this goat level team lost last night? They were without Morant, should have been a guarantee to win

[AlternativeAcc.]

So how come this goat level team lost last night? They were without Morant, should have been a guarantee to win

Saying they're better without morant doesn't imply they're goat level

Thanks for the retarded question though

[PeroAntic]

Saying they're better without morant doesn't imply they're goat level

Thanks for the retarded question though

You said that because they were 20-2 without Morant and then won by 50 points the last game. Idiot.

[AlternativeAcc.]

You said that because they were 20-2 without Morant and then won by 50 points the last game. Idiot.

They were 20-2 without morant? They won by 50 without him in a playoff game against a team with 5 all star caliber players?

God damn

[PeroAntic]

They were 20-2 without morant? They won by 50 without him in a playoff game against a team with 5 all star caliber players?

God damn

GOAT team, right?

[AlternativeAcc.]

GOAT team, right?

MVP right? That was the original conversation about Morant.

You went from saying he's the MVP to failing to argue they're even better with him on the team. that's hilarious. You're such a preposterous retard.

[PeroAntic]

MVP right? That was the original conversation about Morant.

You went from saying he's the MVP to failing to argue they're even better with him on the team. that's hilarious. You're such a preposterous retard.

How did the goat team lose against GSW you pathetic turd? Is that too complicated of a question to answer?

[AlternativeAcc.]

How did the goat team lose against GSW you pathetic turd? Is that too complicated of a question to answer?

If you can find a post where I said they're the GOAT team and they'd best the warriors (who I said before the playoffs were the title favorites after becoming healthy) then I'll concede this one to you.

Until then you're still the forums perpetual jazz rag bitch with the worst takes of all time.

[Full Court]

So how come this goat level team lost last night? They were without Morant, should have been a guarantee to win

Exactly. The Morant haters appear to be just a bunch of dumb Bronies. They draw the simplest of conclusions from single data points that don't take context into account, and then they double down on stupid when they're proven wrong.

Are the Grizzlies good with out Morant? Absolutely. Do they play better defense without Morant? Arguably so. Are they BETTER without Morant? That's just moronic.

[AlternativeAcc.]

Exactly. The Morant haters appear to be just a bunch of dumb Bronies. They draw the simplest of conclusions from single data points that don't take context into account, and then they double down on stupid when they're proven wrong.

Are the Grizzlies good with out Morant? Absolutely. Do they play better defense without Morant? Arguably so. Are they BETTER without Morant? That's just moronic.

You were campaigning for him to win MVP, which is a laughably horrible take considering you can't even make a convincing argument that they're even better with him on the team. The convo went from 'he's MVP' to 'theyre better with him on the team.'

He's literally the only 'superstar' I can think of in history where there's an argument that his team is better without him.

MVP though

[PeroAntic]

You were campaigning for him to win MVP, which is a laughably horrible take considering you can't even make a convincing argument that they're even better with him on the team. The convo went from 'he's MVP' to 'theyre better with him on the team.'

He's literally the only 'superstar' I can think of in history where there's an argument that his team is better without him.

MVP though

Yes, that he should be MVP is a horrible take, but that he should be their sixth man is a great take

You seem incapable of answering the question why did this team which is apparently so amazing without Morant lose... without Morant???

Is the question unclear? Are you illiterate? You might be based on the 'jazz rag' bit

[AlternativeAcc.]

Yes, that he should be MVP is a horrible take, but that he should be their sixth man is a great take

You seem incapable of answering the question why did this team which is apparently so amazing without Morant lose... without Morant???

Is the question unclear? Are you illiterate? You might be based on the 'jazz rag' bit :ol:

In the 3 games Morant played they got outscored by 26.

In the 3 games he DIDNT play they outscored the Warriors by 22.

MVP

Get on your knubs and swallow my c*m. That'd be less humiliating than what I'm doing to you with words.

[Spurs m8]

Exactly. The Morant haters appear to be just a bunch of dumb Bronies. They draw the simplest of conclusions from single data points that don't take context into account, and then they double down on stupid when they're proven wrong.

Are the Grizzlies good with out Morant? Absolutely. Do they play better defense without Morant? Arguably so. Are they BETTER without Morant? That's just moronic.

Yep.

Bron stans

[Full Court]

You were campaigning for him to win MVP, which is a laughably horrible take considering you can't even make a convincing argument that they're even better with him on the team. The convo went from 'he's MVP' to 'theyre better with him on the team.'

He's literally the only 'superstar' I can think of in history where there's an argument that his team is better without him.

MVP though

Nominating Morant for MVP literally put you in tears.

"Waaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh somebody praised Morant! I CAN'T HANDLE IT!!!!"



You should try grief counseling.