-
...
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
The thing is, even if you re-run those seasons with Kobe, it's far from a guarantee they'd win a threepeat again. It took some luck to win it all three times in a row.
-
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
Originally Posted by tpols
They needed Kobe just to get to the Finals though in 2000. Portland was far tougher than Indiana and Kobe iced them. 2001? Kobe scored on 116 ORTG which is elite efficiency with more volume and dimes in the playoffs. Im not saying Ray is a bum playmaker but he's just not on Kobes level as a creative finisher, passer, or dribbler. Or defender.
I agree they might lose with Allen in the Portland series. Kobe was crucial, especially in games 6 and 7. So you have a point there.
-
Embiid > Jokic
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
Originally Posted by HoopsNY
I agree they might lose with Allen in the Portland series. Kobe was crucial, especially in games 6 and 7. So you have a point there.
True, but the counterargument would be Kobe was pretty dreadful in the first 5 games outside of Game 3, they may not have even needed the Game 7 heroics if he doesn't have awful performances in Games 2 & 5
-
Bran Fam Member
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
Allen wasn't anywhere near Kobe's level defensively nor when it came to running an offense, so it's hard to say they'd win more than one championship, even one might be a reach considering Kobe was vital for the Lakers to get past the Blazers in '00 and Spurs/Kings in '01-'02 and that Shaq never won a title without a true elite 2-way wing player who'd carry the team in crunch time. Allen's 3PT shooting combined with Shaq's dominance inside the paint could have still been enough offensively but you lose out on a lot on the other end.
-
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
-
Local High School Star
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
Originally Posted by BlackMamba8
I swear some people in here are stupid as ****
Shaq was the most important player on those teams mamba
-
Decent college freshman
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
Thats basically throwing lockdown defense and playmaking ability out the window. Ray allen was never ever in the same level as Kobe and with Kobe, they squeaked by Portland and Sacramento.
Short answer, 1 year if any
-
2nd Greatest Player
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
Originally Posted by TAZORAC
Shaq was the most important player on those teams mamba
This Shaq put up better numbers than 2nd 3 peat Jordan
-
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
Would prime Kobe win 2/4 with the Heatles playing in the East?
You're lucky i didn't create a new topic about this.
-
NBA lottery pick
Re: Replace Kobe with Ray Allen on 2000-2002 Lakers, do they still win?
I think they'd win 1-2 titles in 2001 and possibly 2000 with a prime Allen in place of Kobe but it would be way more difficult.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|