Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    2,895

    Default Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    His whole career up till then was full of people saying his game can’t age well. Well well well

  2. #2
    Cancer Wally450's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    11,420

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    Something about "after losing his athleticism he'd amount to nothing."



    Seems those people couldn't be any more wrong.

  3. #3
    9x All Defensive 1st And1AllDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    leTop1
    Posts
    10,115

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    interesting

    so then the guy that relies on his athelte abilities is basicaly the longest goat longevity

    so then he does not relies on his athletic abilites

    we win again

  4. #4
    The Puppeteer FireDavidKahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    15,811

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    His GOAT IQ means his game will slowly and gracefully decline instead of a major drop off at any point.

  5. #5
    Not airballing my layups anymore
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    129

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    Instead he ended up aging better than Kobe and MJ

    Fine wine indeed
    Last edited by No Sir; 09-27-2020 at 03:45 PM.

  6. #6
    9x All Defensive 1st And1AllDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    leTop1
    Posts
    10,115

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    Quote Originally Posted by No Sir View Post
    Instead he ended up aging better than Kobe and MJ
    cold hard fax of life

  7. #7
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1,643

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    I actually think it's backwards to say that athletic players age poorly.

    If you're a great athlete, you can afford to lose a step and still be fast enough. But if you're an average athlete and you lose a step, you're suddenly too slow to be on the court.

  8. #8
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Posts
    2,895

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxPlayer View Post
    I actually think it's backwards to say that athletic players age poorly.

    If you're a great athlete, you can afford to lose a step and still be fast enough. But if you're an average athlete and you lose a step, you're suddenly too slow to be on the court.
    To be fair Wade was considered faster than LeBron

  9. #9
    9x All Defensive 1st And1AllDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    leTop1
    Posts
    10,115

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    Quote Originally Posted by MaxPlayer View Post
    I actually think it's backwards to say that athletic players age poorly.

    If you're a great athlete, you can afford to lose a step and still be fast enough. But if you're an average athlete and you lose a step, you're suddenly too slow to be on the court.
    thats not the point

    people said bran relied on his atheltic ability and had no skill and once his ahtletic ability dips his effectivness will dip

    but they were wrong

    bran has all the skill in iq, leadership, passing, shooting, driving, defense

    he has it all

  10. #10
    Local High School Star
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    1,643

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    Quote Originally Posted by GrayGoat View Post
    To be fair Wade was considered faster than LeBron
    True but he also got injured and got too bulky.

  11. #11
    NBA sixth man of the year Micku's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    7,619

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    Quote Originally Posted by And1AllDay View Post
    thats not the point

    people said bran relied on his atheltic ability and had no skill and once his ahtletic ability dips his effectivness will dip

    but they were wrong

    bran has all the skill in iq, leadership, passing, shooting, driving, defense

    he has it all
    He doesn't really have the shooting. Like he has a very inconsistent jumpshot. In Miami he had the season where he was really good from midrange to the 3pt shot, and then in the playoffs it disappeared. You would want to sag on him. That's why in certain times in crucial moments, it gets frustrating when he can't really put up a shot.

    His footwork in the post is also isn't as great. It's too bad because he could do great work. He had some seasons where he was one of the most efficient players in the post, but he doesn't do it as often. And this is without having the best footwork in the game.

    But what he lacks in some skills, he makes up for it with having a smart IQ. He knows he can't do a pull up jumper as well as Kawhi or KD. But he doesn't rely on it. He focus on his strengths. That is put his head down, go the basket and get a lay up. And he is probably the best at finishing for a perimeter player that I ever seen. And when on the off change that he doesn't have the shot, he doesn't take it.

    Like he isn't as dangerous as KD or MJ or Kobe anything when it comes to defending imo. They have multiple ways to attack you and they were great at almost every part of the half court set. LeBron is more limited, but he is efficient at what he does that it's hard to guard. Like you can look at his shooting stats on the every part of the floor. He hardly take midrange jumpers, and he is very streaky. There are times where he is efficient shooting like 40% or more, and there are times where he is garbage. Like shooting like mid 20%. Sometimes he is like that for the whole playoffs, sometimes he is like that just for a series. He just isn't consistent.

    And his off the ball movement isn't as good either, but he is the best passer on the team almost all the time. Although with Rondo on the team, he could go off the ball more if the coach or if he wants to. He could come off of screens to get open or just get into position in the post to do some work.

    And his FT shooting too is a weakness.

    But despite all of that, he still scores a ton. Usually a person who relies on their athleticism like that will regress by now. Players tend to foul you harder the bigger you are. And if you play in the post, ppl tend to get more physical. That's why Bosh, AD and I think LeBron implied or said why they don't want to do it. Shaq went on record saying he needed rest after getting beat up down there lol. And you just naturally gott'a foul big guys harder cuz they have the strength to toss a shot. So, the fact he is still playing a very similar style like he always have been shows how great his body condition is.

    But imo, in general he doesn't have it all. His skillset isn't as good as a Kawhi, Kobe, KD, or a MJ in certain aspects of the game. It definitely shows. But it doesn't matter. His passing, his IQ and his ability to finish at the rim is so good that it covers his weaknesses. He's like a Shaq or Barkley on the perimeter side who never lost his athletic ability haha. He is so big, so strong and so fast that it's hard to guard once he gets room to drive. Shaq said something that instead of trying to do a bunch of jumpers, he worked on his body and made strengths stronger. And it worked out. But sometimes, you gott'a work on your weakness.

    But if you want to watch someone to about parts of basketball, LeBron isn't the one I would tell you to watch when it comes to shooting or footwork. Passing and perhaps shot selection sure. Like you practice Kobe and MJ moves with the footwork, ball fakes, shot selection (MJ, not Kobe). But there are things that are just genetic. You probably can't jump as high as MJ to get that much lift on your jumpshot. You probably won't have big as hand as MJ. You probably won't have the body of LeBron to bully your way to the basket. But there are parts of the game that is teachable.

    What I'm saying is that study Klay Thompson jumpshot over Lebron. Study MJ, Kawhi, Hakeem, and Kobe footwork over Lebron. But study LeBron's shot selection and emulate the IQ.

  12. #12
    2020 Insidehoops MVP Stanley Kobrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    Posts
    4,406

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    he won't keep getting away with this

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Posts
    4,882

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    So many haters were dead certain that he was relying on his athleticism as much as Amare Stoudemire and that he would fade into oblivion after he hit 30. They weren't even hoping that this would happen, they were 100% sure. Like it was a done deal that LeBron would become a role player by 30 and retire by 35.

  14. #14
    The Puppeteer FireDavidKahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    15,811

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    Quote Originally Posted by And1AllDay View Post
    thats not the point

    people said bran relied on his atheltic ability and had no skill and once his ahtletic ability dips his effectivness will dip

    but they were wrong

    bran has all the skill in iq, leadership, passing, shooting, driving, defense

    he has it all
    A+

    People always said LeBron was dominating because of how great of an athlete he was and that once that was gone he was done. The difference is that now his IQ and leadership has increase 100x fold.

  15. #15
    NBA Superstar eliteballer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    14,172

    Default Re: Wasn’t LeBron suppose to be done by age 30?

    With or without steroids?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •