Warriors with (10-0) & without (8-3) Durant in the Playoffs

[Hamtaro CP3KDKG]

[QUOTE=ninephive]Yah of course. Curry never made it to the Finals as a 20-year old in his 2nd season. Here were Curry

[DidUSaySomethin]

[QUOTE=ninephive]Like I said, I

[BigShotBob]

Never seen an irrational and delusional Spurs fan let alone a Tony Porker stan of all people

[ninephive]

Curry got drafted to arguably the worst run team in the league. Parker got drafted to Duncan & Pop. All that needs to be said really

A Duncan and Pop that were getting swept by the Shaq/Kobe Lakers until Parker showed up.

[ninephive]

parker isn't even a top 5 PG in the 00s decade. kidd, nash, cp3, davis, and billups > parker

Hahaha is this a list of everyone that Parker repeatedly knocked out of the playoffs every year?

Or a list of 5 guys that combined for 1/4th the championships that Parker has? Lol, these statpadding losers!

[tontoz]

Steph is obviously great but he wasnt anything special before Draymonds emergence. It got to the point ppl were pretending he was a good defender

Steph/Draymond are a near perfect duo. They compliment each others strengths and weaknesses on both ends very well. Its no coincidence these dudes play almost all of their minutes together and are by far #1 duo in minutes played over the past 5 years

itd be interesting to see them both on different teams

[QUOTE]Now comes the mind-blowing part -- let's take Draymond out of the equation and leave Curry by himself a cast of role players. No Durant. No Thompson. No Green.

With Curry rolling solo, the Warriors are still plus-14.3 in 216 minutes of action. That

[bigkingsfan]

Hahaha is this a list of everyone that Parker repeatedly knocked out of the playoffs every year?

Do you have Kobe/Shaq over Duncan because they repeatedly beat him in the playoffs.

[RRR3]

A Duncan and Pop that were getting swept by the Shaq/Kobe Lakers until Parker showed up.

Yeah what would Duncan have done without Parker’s 14.8 PPG on 48.5 TS%?

[ninephive]

Do you have Kobe/Shaq over Duncan because they repeatedly beat him in the playoffs.

1999 - Duncan sweeps Shaq/Kobe (4-0)
2001 - Kobe/Shaq over Duncan (4-0)
2002 - Kobe/Shaq over Duncan (4-1)
2003 - Duncan over Kobe/Shaq (4-2)
2004 - Kobe/Shaq over Duncan (4-2)

I put Duncan over both Kobe and Shaq because he accomplished as much (more actually) without another top 10-15 player (like they had in each other).

Of course, after they broke up, Kobe started missing the playoffs and ended his career as a bottom feeder and Shaq tried to ring-chase and ended up a washed-up journeyman.

[lilblingy]

1999 - Duncan sweeps Shaq/Kobe (4-0)
2001 - Kobe/Shaq over Duncan (4-0)
2002 - Kobe/Shaq over Duncan (4-1)
2003 - Duncan over Kobe/Shaq (4-2)
2004 - Kobe/Shaq over Duncan (4-2)

I put Duncan over both Kobe and Shaq because he accomplished as much (more actually) without another top 10-15 player (like they had in each other).

Of course, after they broke up, Kobe started missing the playoffs and ended his career as a bottom feeder and Shaq tried to ring-chase and ended up a washed-up journeyman.

Robinson, Ginobili, Parker, Bowen were not scrubs. Lakers we're top heavy but Spurs were pretty well rounded.