View Poll Results: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

Voters
87. You may not vote on this poll
  • Shaq

    43 49.43%
  • Hakeem

    44 50.57%
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 78
  1. #16
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,281

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Quote Originally Posted by kennethgriffen
    hakeem didn't need a top 5 all time player to drag him to the finals past all the real competition
    Neither did Shaq

  2. #17
    NBA Legend tontoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    16,043

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Shaq

    I think Hakeem has become overrated over the years. For a lot of his career he was a black hole that settled for jumpers too often. His career TS of 55.3% is pretty weak for a big.

    Shaq's poor foul shooting was a big problem but I still would pick him over Hakeem.

  3. #18
    Good college starter Facepalm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Posts
    2,985

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Quote Originally Posted by plowking
    .

    Yes, I know Shaq says that Hakeem dusted him, but that is Shaq being classy.
    Shaq being classy? C'mon now

  4. #19
    I Feel Devotion Euroleague's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    13,867

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Hakeem was better at everything except for dunking and committing offensive fouls.

  5. #20
    I make 50-feet jumpers Odinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,041

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    People on internet really love to overrate Hakeem. Wow. Shaq was better.

  6. #21
    9x All Defensive 1st And1AllDay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    leTop1
    Posts
    10,115

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Quote Originally Posted by tontoz
    Shaq

    I think Hakeem has become overrated over the years. For a lot of his career he was a black hole that settled for jumpers too often. His career TS of 55.3% is pretty weak for a big.

    Shaq's poor foul shooting was a big problem but I still would pick him over Hakeem.
    Shaq all the way

  7. #22
    Banned Duncan21formvp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    4,498

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rocket
    Hakeem was better. Even Shaq admits that.
    In 1995 he does.

  8. #23
    Red Nation Smook A.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    15,729

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Hakeem was more skilled

    Shaq was more dominant

    Both are legends and top 10 players of all time.

  9. #24
    National High School Star
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    2,271

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Quote Originally Posted by Odinn
    People on internet really love to overrate Hakeem. Wow. Shaq was better.
    Do you think peak Shaq goes back to back in houston in 94 and 95?

    Do you think peak hakeem three-peats in LA in 2000-02?

  10. #25
    I make 50-feet jumpers Odinn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Posts
    3,041

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Quote Originally Posted by AussieSteve
    Do you think peak Shaq goes back to back in houston in 94 and 95?

    Do you think peak hakeem three-peats in LA in 2000-02?
    In 1994-95 season, if Houston had threepeat Shaq they wouldn't win just 47 games. Do you know Houston's record with Drexler in regular season? 17-18. Shaq wouldn't put his team in that position. Ever.

    Hakeem's 1993-94 season and Shaq's 1999-00 season is pretty comparable. They won the title without a decent supporting cast. Yes, Shaq had Kobe who could average 21 ppg in the playoffs in '00. But Rockets in '94 had a deeper roster.
    The next 4 leading scorers comparison; Hou 47.7 ppg / LA 48.8 ppg

    You do realize Shaq averaged 38/17/2/3 in '00 Finals. Right?

    Maybe '00 Shaq wouldn't be able to win in '94. But the same chance is there for '94 Hakeem in '00.

    Kobe in '00 playoffs; 21.1 - 4.5 - 4.4, LAL record 15-8 and title
    Kobe in '01 playoffs; 29.4 - 7.3 - 6.1, LAL record 15-1 and title
    Kobe in '02 playoffs; 26.6 - 5.8 - 4.6, LAL record 15-4 and title

    You see the correlation, right? What was not changing during that time is Shaq getting 30/15/3/2 in the playoffs and 36/15/3/3 in the finals.
    Shaq's worst finals performance during 3peat was 33/16/5/3 against the Sixers who had DPoY Mutombo and that is still better than Hakeem's '95 Finals display which was the better one between his '94 and '95.

    And let's not pretend that Shaq didn't have to work for his FMVPs and they were won automatically.

  11. #26
    2nd Greatest Player Lebron23's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Land of 6 NBA titles
    Posts
    61,731

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    https://fadeawayworld.net/nba-media/...ad-more-talent Robert Horry said Hakeem was better

  12. #27
    College star
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    4,027

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Hakeem no question

  13. #28
    Local High School Star Gudo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    1,008

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Shaq. But I prefer Hakeem.

  14. #29
    Decent college freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,686

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Just last night, on Inside, Shaq said, "Hakeem was way better than me."




    .

  15. #30
    College star
    Join Date
    Mar 2020
    Posts
    4,027

    Default Re: Shaq vs Hakeem - Who was better?

    Quote Originally Posted by Odinn View Post
    In 1994-95 season, if Houston had threepeat Shaq they wouldn't win just 47 games. Do you know Houston's record with Drexler in regular season? 17-18. Shaq wouldn't put his team in that position. Ever.

    Hakeem's 1993-94 season and Shaq's 1999-00 season is pretty comparable. They won the title without a decent supporting cast. Yes, Shaq had Kobe who could average 21 ppg in the playoffs in '00. But Rockets in '94 had a deeper roster.
    The next 4 leading scorers comparison; Hou 47.7 ppg / LA 48.8 ppg

    You do realize Shaq averaged 38/17/2/3 in '00 Finals. Right?

    Maybe '00 Shaq wouldn't be able to win in '94. But the same chance is there for '94 Hakeem in '00.

    Kobe in '00 playoffs; 21.1 - 4.5 - 4.4, LAL record 15-8 and title
    Kobe in '01 playoffs; 29.4 - 7.3 - 6.1, LAL record 15-1 and title
    Kobe in '02 playoffs; 26.6 - 5.8 - 4.6, LAL record 15-4 and title

    You see the correlation, right? What was not changing during that time is Shaq getting 30/15/3/2 in the playoffs and 36/15/3/3 in the finals.
    Shaq's worst finals performance during 3peat was 33/16/5/3 against the Sixers who had DPoY Mutombo and that is still better than Hakeem's '95 Finals display which was the better one between his '94 and '95.

    And let's not pretend that Shaq didn't have to work for his FMVPs and they were won automatically.
    By 2000 Kobe was arguably the best SG in the game. Furthermore, the Rockets added Drexler just after mid-season, so obviously there were chemistry issues, especially with the locker room fallout with Vernon Maxwell who was repeatedly missing practice after the trade. Their 17-18 record wasn't indicative of their team capability, and this was evidenced no greater than in the playoffs and finals itself.

    I wouldn't say the supporting casts were even. 2000 Kobe was a better player than '95 Drexler. And Glen Rice was better than any third option you could think of on Houston. Roberty Horry was on both teams. And we're also forgetting that Phil Jackson coached the 2000 Lakers team?

    You're also comparing 38 year old Dikembe Mutombo, who was still a great defensive player evidenced by his winning the DPOY award, to prime 1995 Shaq? Who was tougher to defend?

    Shaq feasted in an era that saw the demise of the center and the league literally catering to him. The league turned a blind eye and allowed for Shaq to throw his weight around, something you couldn't do for the first 50 years of league. Wilt talked about this when comparing how centers had to rely on skill and footwork as opposed to later on when guys like Shaq came around and weren't called for offensive fouls like they would have been in the 60s and 70s.

    Lets not forget the league fixed the 2001 Kings/Lakers series? That was one of the most blatant examples in history.

    All a person has to do is look at how Shaq performed against elite centers in the 90s and what he did against piss poor opposition in the the '00s. I did a spread of these stats somewhere on ISH. It certainly helps when the likes of Ewing, Hakeem, Robinson, Daughtery, Mutombo, Mourning, etc are out of their primes or retiring.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •