Why do Kobe stans HYPE Kyrie?

[StrongLurk]

Kyrie's always played in the Eastern conference as well. I guess everything he's done doesn't "count" right? So what's with all the Kobe stans hyping him?

Just trying to understand the logic here.

[kennethgriffen]

the all time finals record holder for 2nd option scoring who hit the biggest title winning shot ever


yeah why would anyone hype the guy

[RRR3]

The answer to “why do Kobe stans do [x]”

Is always

“They’re mad LeBron is better than Kobe”

[PickernRoller]

Trying to understand OP's motivation for opening the thread since according to the LeTard bible Kyrie was a nobody who barely contributed to Lebron's success and thus isn't somone to lose sleep about?

Umm..... what could the real reason be.

[kuniva_dAMiGhTy]

Knocked out the Warriors with a game-winner...in a game 7.

That's a WEST team in case you were wondering.

[StrongLurk]

the all time finals record holder for 2nd option scoring who hit the biggest title winning shot ever


yeah why would anyone hype the guy

So you hype the 2nd option but not the first option?

That logic on it's own doesn't make any sense.

Are you also saying that Kyrie was better than Kobe was in the 2000-2004 finals?

[G0ATbe]

He brings the same things to the table Kobe did.
Skills
high scoring games
clutch shots (kobe in the regular season, kyrie in the finals)
and robin rings (and sometimes alfred rings in kobes case - see 2000 finals)

So naturally we're drawn to him. Also why most of us like Curry.

[aj1987]

They've been stanning Kawhi, KD, Kyrie, Curry,, etc.. Bunch of clueless retards. That's why.

[StrongLurk]

He brings the same things to the table Kobe did.
Skills
high scoring games
clutch shots (kobe in the regular season, kyrie in the finals)
and robin rings (and sometimes alfred rings in kobes case - see 2000 finals)

So naturally we're drawn to him. Also why most of us like Curry.

So you agree that everything that happens in the East counts then? You are stepping out of line with the other Kobe stans.

[kennethgriffen]

So you hype the 2nd option but not the first option?

That logic on it's own doesn't make any sense.

Are you also saying that Kyrie was better than Kobe was in the 2000-2004 finals?

the first option was kyrie actually


i'd post the stats and how lebron got most of his in garbage time... but ISH deleted all my stuff

[StrongLurk]

the first option was kyrie actually


i'd post the stats and how lebron got most of his in garbage time... but ISH deleted all my stuff

Here is what you said describing Kyrie, I know you have a bad memory.

"the all time finals record holder for 2nd option scoring who hit the biggest title winning shot ever"

[aj1987]

the first option was kyrie actually


i'd post the stats and how lebron got most of his in garbage time... but ISH deleted all my stuff

Just like how Pau was the first option and Fisher was the 2nd option in '09 and '10, while Brick was getting his in garbage time? Gotcha.

['Toine=MVP]

It is super rare to see anyone here hyping Kyrie. You see the opposite a lot, but most people seem to have him as fringe top 10 current players or just a touch below that.

Find me someone that has him in the top 4 or 5.

[kennethgriffen]

Here is what you said describing Kyrie, I know you have a bad memory.

"the all time finals record holder for 2nd option scoring who hit the biggest title winning shot ever"

kyrie was the 2nd option overall. but during the most important moments he was the focal point

[kennethgriffen]

Just like how Pau was the first option and Fisher was the 2nd option in '09 and '10, while Brick was getting his in garbage time? Gotcha.

kyrie averaged basically 30ppg for the 2016 finals


you can actually make an argument for him


you cant for gasol