-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
C Bosh 11-14':[COLOR="White"]....[/COLOR] 17.3... 7.4.. 1.6.. 57.8 ts.. 19.4 PER.. 0.168 ws/58
K Love 15-18':[COLOR="White"]....[/COLOR] 17.1.. 10.0.. 2.1.. 57.3 ts.. 20.1 PER.. 0.169 ws/48
Tristan 15-17':[COLOR="White"]......[/COLOR] 8.1.... 0.7.. 8.7.. 59.4 ts.. 15.6 PER.. 0.169 ws/48
Jamison 10':[COLOR="White"]......[/COLOR] 15.8.... 7.7.. 1.3.. 53.0 ts.. 16.7 PER.. 0.122 ws/48
Mo Will 09-10':[COLOR="White"]...[/COLOR] 16.9... 3.2.. 4.6.. 58.5 ts.. 16.7 PER.. 0.164 ws/48
Shaquille 10':[COLOR="White"]......[/COLOR] 12.0... 6.7.. 1.5.. 56.5 ts.. 17.4 PER.. 0.115 ws/48
Zydrunas 05-09':[COLOR="White"].[/COLOR] 14.3... 8.2.. 1.3.. 54.2 ts.. 19.3 PER.. 0.153 ws/48
Pippen.... 89':[COLOR="White"].....[/COLOR] 14.4.... 6.1.. 3.5.. 52.4 ts.. 14.9 PER.... 0.80 ws/48
-
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Based on this argument, Lebron is a top 3 player of all time.
Good job 3ball
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Originally Posted by StrongLurk
Based on this argument, Lebron is a top 3 player of all time.
Good job 3ball
No, it just means he had tons of good players, including 3rd, 4th and even 5th options that were equal or better than 89' pippen
Notice how Wade and Kyrie aren't even listed... It's understood that they were much better
Oh shit I forgot Kuzma..
-
SexLand
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
No. Pippen was FAR better on defense and more efficient on offense.
Is Jennifer Aniston better than Joel Embiid(at basketball)?
A better question is Ingram vs. 2019 Pippen.
I'm not sure he'd be better than 2019 Pippen.
Is this thread worth posting?
Hey guys, was Butterbean better than '89 Mike Tyson?
Are you F***** kidding me?
Brandon Ingram isn't better than Andrew Wiggins.
Yo... :
What a weird-ass question. I'm legit laughing out loud at this. Literal LOL.
How did you even come up with this comparison?
The thread of this on ISH is just as funny. Damned shame the OP there was banned here, just for the comedy value. Poor guy legit believes Ingram better than Pippen (89 version) and seems to be questioning Ingram vs Pipp overall. Hilarious
lmao
-
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Originally Posted by 3ball
No, it just means he had tons of good players, including 3rd, 4th and even 5th options that were equal or better than 89' pippen
Notice how Wade and Kyrie aren't even listed... It's understood that they were much better
You simply posted some basic stats and advanced stats...which is all I'm talking about as well.
Using this thought process, Lebron is clearly a top 3 player ever factoring in his production, efficiency, and advanced stats in the regular season, playoffs, AND finals.
-
Gif-ted
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Ingraham 16.4 5.0 2.9 52.2 ts.. 11.8 PER.... 0.027 ws/48
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Originally Posted by Uncle Drew
lmao
That was the Ingram/Pippen comparison
This is different - only Bosh, Love, Jamison, Mo, Zydrunas, Shaq Kuzma, and Tristan - all equal or better to 89' Pippen
So why don't you post this over on the other site? See what the responses are.. just quote the OP and then copy/paste the text into a new thread over there.. report back
Btw, the only reason people scoff at the ingram/pippen comparison is because we don't get to see with our own eyes how bad 89' pippen was - he would be 5-10 with these Lakers too, with worse production, handle, shooting and playmaking than ingram (which is what he was in 89')
And of course, Ingram doesn't have mj to get him better like pip did, so he's stagnating this year while pippen was coming into his own in year 3
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Originally Posted by bigkingsfan
Ingraham 16.4 5.0 2.9 52.2 ts.. 11.8 PER.... 0.027 ws/48
[COLOR="Navy"]As the 3rd and 4th option many nights, rather than the featured, clear-cut 2nd option tasked with getting MJ the ball
Pretty big difference[/COLOR].. the rest of this post is copypasta
And this thread isn't the ingram/pippen comparison - this is different - only Bosh, Love, Jamison, Mo, Zydrunas, Shaq Kuzma, and Tristan - all equal or better to 89' Pippen
So why don't you post this over on the other site? See what the responses are.. just quote the OP and then copy/paste the text into a new thread over there.. report back
Btw, the only reason people scoff at the ingram/pippen comparison is because we don't get to see with our own eyes how bad 89' pippen was - he would be 5-10 with these Lakers too, with worse production, handle, shooting and playmaking than ingram (which is what he was in 89')
And of course, Ingram doesn't have mj to get him better like pip did, so he's stagnating this year while pippen was coming into his own in year 3
-
SexLand
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Originally Posted by 3ball
That was the Ingram/Pippen comparison
This is different - only Bosh, Love, Jamison, Mo, Zydrunas, Shaq Kuzma, and Tristan - all equal or better to 89' Pippen
So why don't you post this over on the other site? See what the responses are.. just quote the OP and then copy/paste the text into a new thread over there.. report back
Btw, the only reason people scoff at the ingram/pippen comparison is because we don't get to see with our own eyes how bad 89' pippen was - he would be 5-10 with these Lakers too, with worse production, handle, shooting and playmaking than ingram (which is what he was in 89')
And of course, Ingram doesn't have mj to get him better like pip did, so he's stagnating this year while pippen was coming into his own in year 3
You're being laughed at on two forums now, one of which you didn't even post on. That's a new low, even for you.
-
Gif-ted
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Ingraham 2nd year first option
16.1 5.3 3.9 53.6 ts.. 13.8 PER.... 0.068 ws/48
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Originally Posted by Uncle Drew
You're being laughed at on two forums now. One of which you didn't even post on. That's a new low, even for you.
My posts clearly get to you
But im just posting the truth.. if it entertains you guys that don't know enough to see it's validity, then that's fine too
-
81
-
NBA Legend and Hall of Famer
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Originally Posted by bigkingsfan
Ingraham 2nd year first option
16.1 5.3 3.9 53.6 ts.. 13.8 PER.... 0.068 ws/48
Ingram > 89' Pippen
Especially considering he didn't get the MJ boost like pippen did
But this thread isn't about Ingram - it's about 8 other lebron teammates that were > 89' Pippen... Lebron had far more help than MJ and most stars.. shit tons of help
btw, I realized the other day that lebron won't win shit with this team - I realized this once I learned that ONLY lebron played bad defense in his last 4 Finals losses - it's like, this guy is a FRAUD...
i.e. No spur or warrior scored more than 2 pts above there RS average in the 14/15/17/18 Finals, except Iggy (8.5 over his average), Durant (10.1), and Kawhi (5.0)... And McGee (4.0).. so Bron's teammates were playing their ass off and holding their man down, but lebron was the weak link that ruined it
-
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
MJ was like Kuzma. He scored quickly which allowed teammates to play their games unlike Lebron ball.
-
Gif-ted
Re: All these guys are equal, better, or much better than 89' Pippen
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|