Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Offensive BPM is good; Defensive BPM worthless, according to the creators

    "There are limitations on all box score stats – if the box score doesn't measure a particular contribution, a box-score-based metric can only approximate that contribution. This is not a great hindrance on the offensive side, [COLOR="Navy"]as nearly everything of importance on offense is captured by the box score (only missing things like screen-setting), but on defense the box score is quite limited. [COLOR="DarkRed"]Blocks, steals, and rebounds[/COLOR], along with minutes and what little information offensive numbers yield about defensive performance are all that is available.[/COLOR] Such critical components of defense as positioning, communication, and the other factors that make Kevin Garnett and Tim Duncan elite on defense can't be captured, unfortunately.

    [COLOR="Navy"]What does this mean? Box Plus/Minus is good at measuring offense and solid overall, but the defensive numbers in particular should not be considered definitive. Look at the defensive values as a guide, but don't hesitate to discount them[/COLOR] when a player is well known as a good or bad defender."


    https://www.basketball-reference.com/about/bpm.html


    The bolded red shows the fallacy of defensive BPM - it primarily measures defensive boards, steals and blocks (and steals are much more valuable than blocks in the formula)..

    So bird has higher DBPM than pippen because of higher defensive rebounds and comparable steals.. any frontcourt player that gets steals will have high BPM because they already have high defensive boards..

    similarly, today's PG's have an edge because they have high defensive rebounds coupled with their naturally higher steals levels - that's why Westbrook's higher DBPM in recent years destroy pippen's highs, despite being an inferior defender... Guys like harden get higher BPM than Bruce Bowen many years because Bowen wasn't a steals or defensive rebounds guy

    So look at Bird's DBPM - it's 2.5.. so that means his defense adds 2.5 points to the scoreboard every 100 possessions, or more than Pippen's... but we know this is bullshit because DBPM is just a rebound and steals tracker... Ditto on Westbrook's DBPM - it's just a rebound and steals tracker... Ditto harden over Bowen... And ditto Pippen's - we know he's a great defender, but not based on his DBPM, which is just a counter of a couple select stats.

    TLDR: the creators of BPM say defensive BPM is bullshit because it tracks only a few defensive metrics, while offensive BPM is good because it captures most of the offensive metrics
    .
    Last edited by 3ball; 01-26-2019 at 10:10 AM.

  2. #2
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Manny98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    In Your Head
    Posts
    20,919

    Default Re: Offensive BPM is good; Defensive BPM worthless, according to the creators

    LeBron has a higher career BPM than Jordan

  3. #3
    Le11th superduper's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    9,405

    Default Re: Offensive BPM is good; Defensive BPM worthless, according to the creators

    Quote Originally Posted by Manny98
    LeBron has a higher career BPM than Jordan

  4. #4
    Jokic Stan
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    10,672

    Default Re: Offensive BPM is good; Defensive BPM worthless, according to the creators

    Quote Originally Posted by superduper

  5. #5
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Re: Offensive BPM is good; Defensive BPM worthless, according to the creators

    Quote Originally Posted by Manny98

    LeBron has a higher career BPM than Jordan
    Mainly due to higher defensive BPM, for the same reason bird has higher DBPM than Pippen:


    "DBPM essentially counts defensive rebs, steals and blocks.. So bird has higher DBPM than pippen because of higher defensive rebounds and comparable steals.. any frontcourt player that gets steals will have high BPM because they already have high defensive boards.."

    similarly, today's PG's have an edge because they have high defensive rebounds coupled with their naturally higher steals levels - that's why Westbrook's higher DBPM in recent years destroy pippen's highs, despite being an inferior defender... Guys like harden get higher BPM than Bruce Bowen many years because Bowen wasn't a steals or defensive rebounds guy

    So look at Bird's DBPM - it's 2.5.. so that means his defense adds 2.5 points to the scoreboard every 100 possessions, or more than Pippen's... but we know this is bullshit because DBPM is just a rebound and steals tracker... Ditto on Westbrook's DBPM - it's just a rebound and steals tracker... Ditto harden over Bowen... And ditto Pippen's - we know he's a great defender, but not based on his DBPM, which is just a counter of a couple select stats.

  6. #6
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Manny98's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    In Your Head
    Posts
    20,919

    Default Re: Offensive BPM is good; Defensive BPM worthless, according to the creators

    LeBron has a higher career OBPM as well though

  7. #7
    The Puppeteer FireDavidKahn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    15,811

    Default Re: Offensive BPM is good; Defensive BPM worthless, according to the creators


  8. #8
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer 3ball's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    that ghoulash joint
    Posts
    31,921

    Default Re: Offensive BPM is good; Defensive BPM worthless, according to the creators

    Quote Originally Posted by Manny98
    LeBron has a higher career OBPM as well though
    Only due to the wizards stint, otherwise MJ's is easily higher.. we'll see how lebron's bpm starts declining over the next few years now that he's injured and declining

    And btw, Lebron is a boxscore kind of guy, so he leads the raw boxscores (although not versus bulls' MJ)

    But when you convert that boxscore to wins (win share), MJ is better.. because MJ was more of a winner

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •