THROWBACK: Stronger men are more right-wing oriented

[GIF REACTION]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/scie...ight-wing.html

[QUOTE]Researchers found that men's opinions on redistribution of wealth could be predicted by their upper body strength, with powerful men more likely to take a conservative stance of protecting their own interests.
In contrast men who were just as wealthy but were of a flimsier build were less opposed to policies like those of Labour leader Ed Miliband, which would involve surrendering some of their wealth to society.
The scientists, from Aarhus University in Denmark, analysed the wealth, bicep size and views on economic redistribution of hundreds of men in America, Denmark and Argentina.

They found that wealthy men with strong arms were less likely to support economic redistribution, or the fairer sharing of wealth among society, and unsurprisingly strong men with less money supported the policy.
But among physically weaker men, the pattern was reversed. Those with plenty of money were less opposed to redistributing it, while those who were poorer were less supportive.

Michael Bang Petersen, who led the study, said that overall stronger men took a more self-interested position but their stance varied depending on their strength.

He explained: "Our results demonstrate that physically weak males are more reluctant than physically strong males to assert their self-interest

[kNIOKAS]

Did they control for IQ?

[TheMan]

The study could've shown results that rightwing blowhards had ten inch cawks on average, the OP would still be an overcompensating tiny dick faggot.

[LikeMike]

The study could've shown results that rightwing blowhards had ten inch cawks on average, the OP would still be an overcompensating tiny dick faggot.

[Take Your Lumps]

The study could've shown results that rightwing blowhards had ten inch cawks on average, the OP would still be an overcompensating tiny dick faggot.

[fiddy]

The study could've shown results that rightwing blowhards had ten inch cawks on average, the OP would still be an overcompensating tiny dick faggot.

You insecurr bruh?

[JohnFreeman]

Trump 2016

[nathanjizzle]

but what about coc size?

[fiddy]

but what about coc size?

What do you care? Needle D hoes like aint about nothing

[ThePhantomCreep]

The study could've shown results that rightwing blowhards had ten inch cawks on average, the OP would still be an overcompensating tiny dick faggot.

Pretty obvious the OP is overcompensating. It's a conservative trait.

Behind all the forced machismo, right-wingers are scared of their own shadows:

http://www.wired.com/2008/09/fearmongering-h/

[JEFFERSON MONEY]

What the f*ck kind of force inspired your idiotic obvious bogan azz to come up here and tell us that DERP DERP cowboy country Bible guy benchez more than metropolitan NYC guy.

What's next? Cats meow, and bees make honey. SHOCKER.

PS - A person skilled with a computer commands more real power than muscle car in 2015. Source: Film: Spectre.

[warriorfan]

What the f*ck kind of force inspired your idiotic obvious bogan azz to come up here and tell us that DERP DERP cowboy country Bible guy benchez more than metropolitan NYC guy.

What's next? Cats meow, and bees make honey. SHOCKER.

PS - A person skilled with a computer commands more real power than muscle car in 2015. Source: Film: Spectre.

meltdown

[Jailblazers7]

The fact that studies like this exist never cease to amaze me.

[Akrazotile]

The fact that studies like this exist never cease to amaze me.

Don't forget about the classic:

Taxpayers Spend $3.5 Million to Find Out Why Lesbians Are Fat