-
Let's take a closer look at LeBron's junk (meaning: his supporting casts)
I think this is necessary because there has been some serious under-appreciation of the man on this board lately, especially by posters masquerading as "fans" of his, only to deride and dismiss him in subversive ways. But the fact is there has never been a star who's junk compares to Lebron in size and scope. Let's take a look:
In 2007 the starting lineup around him in the NBA finals was literally Larry Hughes, Sasha Pavlovic, Drew Gooden and an old Zydrunas Ilguaskus. That is a massive sack of junk. Who has ever had the burden of carrying that much junk into a finals, but Lebron? It's crazy.
In 2011 he had two average all-star level players, and everything else on the roster was puke-worthy. There was no depth, period. Erick Dampier was in the rotation. Mike Bibby actually PLAYED, and didn't make a shot the whole playoffs. Juwan Howard literally on the active roster. It was a who's who of washed up junk. Lebron's junk. Lebron's giant, black junk.
The next two years, he FINALLY had some decent players around him, and delivered chips with ease.
And of course last year... My goodness. Do I really need to remind you who started alongside him in the finals? Lebron's junk was just absolutely huge, and it had the Warriors' mouths watering. They were wide eyed in disbelief at the magnitude of Lebron's junk, and simply could not wait to go at it.
So if you don't mind, please before you criticize what this guy has achieved, remember just how big his junk is. It's bigger than anything you could ever identify with (especially kobe stans).
Let's honestly have a round of applause for Lebron's junk. Five star this thread and rep me in the future, thank you.
-
Knicks all da way
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
Are you bored in life? Can't you possibly find something more fun than this?
-
Free the banned users.
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
-
Austin Reaves Fam
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
you have been on fire lately
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
is there even a way to see lebrons junk without taking a closer look
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
meltdown
-
Austin Reaves Fam
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
Originally Posted by Akrazotile
I think this is necessary because there has been some serious under-appreciation of the man on this board lately, especially by posters masquerading as "fans" of his, only to deride and dismiss him in subversive ways. But the fact is there has never been a star who's junk compares to Lebron in size and scope. Let's take a look:
In 2007 the starting lineup around him in the NBA finals was literally Larry Hughes, Sasha Pavlovic, Drew Gooden and an old Zydrunas Ilguaskus. That is a massive sack of junk. Who has ever had the burden of carrying that much junk into a finals, but Lebron? It's crazy.
In 2011 he had two average all-star level players, and everything else on the roster was puke-worthy. There was no depth, period. Erick Dampier was in the rotation. Mike Bibby actually PLAYED, and didn't make a shot the whole playoffs. Juwan Howard literally on the active roster. It was a who's who of washed up junk. Lebron's junk. Lebron's giant, black junk.
The next two years, he FINALLY had some decent players around him, and delivered chips with ease.
And of course last year... My goodness. Do I really need to remind you who started alongside him in the finals? Lebron's junk was just absolutely huge, and it had the Warriors' mouths watering. They were wide eyed in disbelief at the magnitude of Lebron's junk, and simply could not wait to go at it.
So if you don't mind, please before you criticize what this guy has achieved, remember just how big his junk is. It's bigger than anything you could ever identify with (especially kobe stans).
Let's honestly have a round of applause for Lebron's junk. Five star this thread and rep me in the future, thank you.
Allen Iverson, Jason Kidd twice in a row, Dwight Howard. Those dudes actually won games with the garbage they were hauling doe. Bron with that 35% shooting in a sweep doe.
No vaseline.
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
Originally Posted by Mr. Jabbar
as the founding father of the lebron family i must clarify op does not represent our thoughts on this matter. we are well aware and admit our king has grouped with the leagues best talent in an already depleted conference. we still love him for other reasons which ain't the case to discuss here.
#kang
If only all LeBron groupies were as observant and realistic as you... Notice how in an equally shitty Eastern conference (pretty much the norm for the East post '98 w/ the exception of 2010 when the 61 win Cavs couldn't get out of the 2nd round... pure coincidence doe), Jason Kidd was able to lead the Nets with Kenyon Martin as the first offensive option to back-to-back Finals berths... but Bron needed to form super teams in similar circumstances in order to lose multiple times in the finals.
Think about it this way- in a Eastern conference with a sub 40-win%, Jason Kidd's trash hauling company faced the Lakers (MDE w/ prime SidekickBe) at the tail end of their 3-peat and prime Duncan's Spurs. The Nets went 2-8 in those series. LeBron, coming out of a worse Eastern conference, faced the ghost of Tim Duncan w/ some D-Leaguers and the Al B. Sure light-skinned all stars in back to back finals. His teams went 3-8.
Incredible. Truly, he is the king of kings.
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
Originally Posted by DonDadda59
If only all LeBron groupies were as observant and realistic as you... Notice how in an equally shitty Eastern conference (pretty much the norm for the East post '98 w/ the exception of 2010 when the 61 win Cavs couldn't get out of the 2nd round... pure coincidence doe), Jason Kidd was able to lead the Nets with Kenyon Martin as the first offensive option to back-to-back Finals berths... but Bron needed to form super teams in similar circumstances in order to lose multiple times in the finals.
Think about it this way- in a Eastern conference with a sub 40-win%, Jason Kidd's trash hauling company faced the Lakers (MDE w/ prime SidekickBe) at the tail end of their 3-peat and prime Duncan's Spurs. The Nets went 2-8 in those series. LeBron, coming out of a worse Eastern conference, faced the ghost of Tim Duncan w/ some D-Leaguers and the Al B. Sure light-skinned all stars in back to back finals. His teams went 3-8.
Incredible. Truly, he is the king of kings.
Wait, what? His team won one of those finals, how could they possibly have gone 3-8??
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
Originally Posted by Akrazotile
Wait, what? His team won one of those finals, how could they possibly have gone 3-8??
2014: 1-4
2015: 2-4
3-8
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
Originally Posted by DonDadda59
2014: 1-4
2015: 2-4
3-8
Ok, I thought you were talking about their back to back finals with the Spurs.
His junk is still huge. And his huge junk limits him like it would for anyone. When you have that much junk it can actually be a challenge more than anything. Ask Jonah Falcon. Or anyone in the REAL Lebron fam. Lets not act like any of the teams Kidd beat (and Kidd def has big junk too, no disrespect) were as good as the Pistons and Celtic teams Lebron was beating down with his massive junk. Those were championship teams he was beating. Hell the Pacers and Bulls teams he had to beat were probably better than what Kidd's nets were facing. Yeah Lebron's teams basically had a bye in the first round but after that it was no cakewalk. And again, he was winning these series without any other superstars in their prime. It was just his will and a huge sack of junk.
-
Re: Let's take a closer look at Lebron's junk
Originally Posted by Akrazotile
Ok, I thought you were talking about their back to back finals with the Spurs.
His junk is still huge. And his huge junk limits him like it would for anyone. When you have that much junk it can actually be a challenge more than anything. Ask Jonah Falcon. Or anyone in the REAL Lebron fam. Lets not act like any of the teams Kidd beat (and Kidd def has big junk too, no disrespect) were as good as the Pistons and Celtic teams Lebron was beating down with his massive junk. Those were championship teams he was beating. Hell the Pacers and Bulls teams he had to beat were probably better than what Kidd's nets were facing. Yeah Lebron's teams basically had a bye in the first round but after that it was no cakewalk. And again, he was winning these series without any other superstars in their prime. It was just his will and a huge sack of junk.
Shitty conference is a shitty conference. The one time the East had a win percentage higher than the mid 30s-low 40s, Bron's 61 win team couldn't get past the second round and he was forced to tuck tail and run to Wade county.
Who knows how many Finals J. Kidd could've lost had he had the good sense to trade in Kenyon Martin and Keith Van Horn for Jermaine O'Neal and Paul Pierce in an hour long prime time television special?
In LeKang's case, we know it's 4 lost finals... Would've been 5 without divine intervention. Oh well, at least future stars will learn from this example- if you're playing in a conference with mid 30s win%s and you find the going too tough, stack the deck in your favor and you too can go 2/6 in the finals.
How great is our God? Long live the Kang.
-
The triggerer
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|