-
The Wizard
Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Here's how we should rank all time great players:
Firstly, split NBA history into two eras, players who made their mark PRE-1990, and players who made their mark POST-1990 (I'm not attached to 1990, 1985 may be a better cut off). This doesn't mean that MJ's 1980's seasons don't count in ranking him, but I would compare him to post-1990 players
THEN, split the players you're ranking into guards, wings, and bigs
Then, do a mount rushmore (4 guys) for each
so for post-1990 I have:
Guards: MJ, Kobe, Wade, Nash
Wings: MJ, Bron, Kobe, Durant
Bigs: Shaq, Timmy D, Dirk, KG
The only flaw is that swingmen can be guards or wings but it's still way better than all-time top-10 lists. MJ tops both guards and wings for me because judging him as a guard or as a wing he's still tops.
-
Lol
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
-
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
why do you have bron ahead of kobe in the wing list
-
The Wizard
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
why do you have bron ahead of kobe in the wing list
Because I'm not retarded.
-
Lol
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Oh well, there goes this thread. Sorry for trolling about Chalmers OP.
-
Justice4 the ABA
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by ralph_i_el
Here's how we should rank all time great players:
Firstly, split NBA history into two eras, players who made their mark PRE-1990, and players who made their mark POST-1990 (I'm not attached to 1990, 1985 may be a better cut off). This doesn't mean that MJ's 1980's seasons don't count in ranking him, but I would compare him to post-1990 players
THEN, split the players you're ranking into guards, wings, and bigs
Then, do a mount rushmore (4 guys) for each
so for post-1990 I have:
Guards: MJ, Kobe, Wade, Nash
Wings: MJ, Bron, Kobe, Durant
Bigs: Shaq, Timmy D, Dirk, KG
The only flaw is that swingmen can be guards or wings but it's still way better than all-time top-10 lists. MJ tops both guards and wings for me because judging him as a guard or as a wing he's still tops.
What's so special about 1990 or 1985 as a cut off?
-
The Wizard
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by Dr.J4ever
What's so special about 1990 or 1985 as a cut off?
nothing is special about the date. I just needed a cut off so guys like me that didn't actually watch the 70's and 80's don't feel compelled to talk about those players.
-
The Wizard
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by RRR3
Oh well, there goes this thread. Sorry for trolling about Chalmers OP.
nah you're cool man. I thought it was funny.
Kenneth is seriously going to get me to stop posting though. I can't handle such aggressive ignorance.
-
Lol
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by ralph_i_el
nah you're cool man. I thought it was funny.
Kenneth is seriously going to get me to stop posting though. I can't handle such aggressive ignorance.
Yeah, even if you ether him, he comes back. Like a cockroach.
-
2nd Greatest Player
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by ralph_i_el
Because I'm not retarded.
-
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
good thread
i'll going to limit myself to players i have seen, who were didn't retire before 1984. my cut off will be 1999. also forwards instead of wings since guards and wings overlap and i'd rather do centers than point guards.
1984-99
GUARDS: Jordan, Magic, Drexler, Stockton
FORWARDS: Pipper, Barkley, Bird, Hill
CENTERS: Shaq, Hakeem, Robinson, Walton
2000-15
GUARDS: Kobe, Nash, Paul, Wade
FORWARDS: James, Garnett, Leonard, Nowitzki
CENTERS: Ilgauskas, Nesterovic, MacCaulaugh, Sabonis
-
Justice4 the ABA
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by ralph_i_el
nothing is special about the date. I just needed a cut off so guys like me that didn't actually watch the 70's and 80's don't feel compelled to talk about those players.
Okay, good thing then.
Everyone's top 10 list should really have asterisks anyway on players you've seen live or those you've only seen through YT or read about. It's really tough to gauge how good players from different eras were based on what other fans say or even expert opinion. There's nothing quite like watching a player live in the moment react to pressure, tactics, opposing players that were talked about previous to the game. It's a totally different feel, and you get a real sense of how good a player really is.
-
Believeland
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Mount Rushmores and era-specific tiers are dumb.
-
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by MP.Trey
Mount Rushmores and era-specific tiers are dumb.
yeah there's only one mount rushmore
jordan
gretzky
ruth
ali
case ****ing closed gay thread
-
Decent playground baller
Re: Top-10 Lists Are Dumb
Originally Posted by ralph_i_el
Here's how we should rank all time great players:
Firstly, split NBA history into two eras, players who made their mark PRE-1990, and players who made their mark POST-1990 (I'm not attached to 1990, 1985 may be a better cut off). This doesn't mean that MJ's 1980's seasons don't count in ranking him, but I would compare him to post-1990 players
THEN, split the players you're ranking into guards, wings, and bigs
Then, do a mount rushmore (4 guys) for each
so for post-1990 I have:
Guards: MJ, Kobe, Wade, Nash
Wings: MJ, Bron, Kobe, Durant
Bigs: Shaq, Timmy D, Dirk, KG
The only flaw is that swingmen can be guards or wings but it's still way better than all-time top-10 lists. MJ tops both guards and wings for me because judging him as a guard or as a wing he's still tops.
Bash top 10 lists do you? Dumb your idea is.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|