Horace Grant vs. Tristan Thompson

[3ball]

.
Regular Season:

Tristan: 10.1 ppg, 8.4 rpg, 0.7 blk
Grant:[color="white"]..[/color] 11.2 ppg, 8.1 rpg, 1.0 blk


Playoffs:

Tristan:[COLOR="White"].[/COLOR] 9.6 ppg, 10.8 rpg, 1.2 blk
Grant:[COLOR="White"].[/COLOR] 11.2 ppg,[COLOR="White"]..[/COLOR] 8.6 rpg, 1.0 blk


Tristan with significantly more rebounds in playoffs... More blocks too...

Both players are simple play-finishers around the rim, so the scoring is wash...

It's razor-thin close... Either way, MJ 3-peats with Tristan the same way he did with Grant.
.

[ArbitraryWater]

you already did a version of this thread.. mods

[LAZERUSS]

Grant BY FAR and away.

Thompson without Lebron...24-58 and 33-49.

Grant without MJ... 55-27 and then 60-22.

Next...

[Uncle Drew]

Grant was an All-Star and an All-Defensive player.

This guy is pathetic.

[LAZERUSS]

BTW, when are you going to stop with these incessant "anti-Lebron" posts.

And please...quit bashing MJ's supporting casts, which were, BY FAR, the best in the league in the 90's (and against a watered-down NBA, too.)

[LAZERUSS]

Grant was an All-Star and an All-Defensive.

This guy is pathetic.

And Grant was proven winner...something that Thompson has proven so far, that he is clearly not.

[G0ATbe]

Grant was an All-Star and an All-Defensive player.

This guy is pathetic.

That just further goes to show how weak of an era the 90s were.

[3ball]

Grant was an All-Star and an All-Defensive player.

This guy is pathetic.

Thru 4 seasons (like Tristan this year), Horace was a nobody with zero accolades and worse stats..

Tristan's 10/8 career averages are better than Horace after 4 seasons - heck, they already match Horace's career 11/8 averages.

In his entire 17-year career, Horace was an all-star for 1 season (after he left the Bulls) and was a 2nd Team defender in 1993.. That's all he got in 17 seasons of work..

[livinglegend]

Thompson was Lebron's 2nd option and Grant was Jordan's 3rd option.




NEXT

[warriorfan]

you already did a version of this thread.. mods

[3ball]

Thompson was Lebron's 2nd option and Grant was Jordan's 3rd option.




NEXT

Actually, Thompson was the 4th option - here are the playoff averages:

Smith: 13/5
Mosgov: 11/7/2
Thompson: 10/11


Btw, Mosgov averaged 14/8/2 in the Finals, on 50% FG.

This is FAR superior to Pippen's 15 ppg on 34% FG in 1996 Finals, or his 15 PPG on 41% in the 1998 Finals.

[Bankaii]

Actually, Thompson was the 4th option - here are the playoff averages:

Smith: 13/5
Mosgov: 11/7/2
Thompson: 10/11


Btw, Mosgov averaged 14/8/2 in the Finals, on 50% FG.

This is FAR superior to Pippen's 15 ppg on 34% FG in 1996 Finals, or his 15 PPG on 41% in the 1998 Finals.

Lol dude how stupid are you. Mozgov is a center, 90 percent of his shots are dunks/layups. Pippen is a perimeter player. And why'd you so conveniently leave off JR shooting 31%? Or Pippen's 8 reb and 3 assists in 1996? Or his 7reb, 5ast, 2 steals? Or you know his defense, the best aspect of his game?

I'd tell you to stop posting bullshit but it's actually fun taking a shit on you.

[KyrieTheFuture]

Is 3ball actually worse than the Kobe and LeBron fanboys?

[SouBeachTalents]

LeBron went 2/6 yet OP is melting down worse than anybody else on the board. Dude's making literally multiple threads about LeBron a day. It's beyond rent free at this point, it's legitimately an uncontrollable obsession

[livinglegend]

Actually, Thompson was the 4th option - here are the playoff averages:

Smith: 13/5
Mosgov: 11/7/2
Thompson: 10/11


Btw, Mosgov averaged 14/8/2 in the Finals, on 50% FG.

This is FAR superior to Pippen's 15 ppg on 34% FG in 1996 Finals, or his 15 PPG on 41% in the 1998 Finals.

Grant ( Jordan 3rd option) >>>>>>> Smith ( Lebron 2nd option)




NEXT