-
I rule the local playground
Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Down 3 starters, 2 of which are all stars and everybody still playing is banged up
I thought the warriors were the best team in the league
-
Not airballing my layups anymore
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
with the offensive boards, i genuinely think that TT has been better for the Cavs that Love would have. Especially with their poor shooting %age.
Though you could say that with Love, the %age would have been greater.
-
I rule the local playground
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Originally Posted by Castor Troy
with the offensive boards, i genuinely think that TT has been better for the Cavs that Love would have. Especially with their poor shooting %age.
Though you could say that with Love, the %age would have been greater.
Not disagreeing, but you can't say the cavs would be worse off with him healthy.
-
Moderator
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Honestly if cavs win it all while missing two starters i fail to see how anybody can stop this team from winning at least the next 2-3 years.
-
I rule the local playground
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Originally Posted by All Net
Honestly if cavs win it all while missing two starters i fail to see how anybody can stop this team from winning at least the next 2-3 years.
It may not be the case going forward, but Andy was a starter for a long time. You could say were down 3.
-
Great college starter
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Originally Posted by All Net
Honestly if cavs win it all while missing two starters i fail to see how anybody can stop this team from winning at least the next 2-3 years.
Because every year is different, because different teams match up well against different teams.
-
History made 2016
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Originally Posted by All Net
Honestly if cavs win it all while missing two starters i fail to see how anybody can stop this team from winning at least the next 2-3 years.
Yep and that's where all these stupid cavs are better without KI and love derp arguments are coming from. People scared.
-
0.28571428571
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Originally Posted by All Net
Honestly if cavs win it all while missing two starters i fail to see how anybody can stop this team from winning at least the next 2-3 years.
You think Durant and Westbrook would be getting as shut down as Klay and Curry are by this defense?
-
I rule the local playground
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Gotta get there. Good luck in the west.
By the way the cavs score 120 every game on OKC
-
0.28571428571
-
I rule the local playground
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
That's called hyperbole. In any case, it would be ugly. Way uglier than this series.
Edit: let me be clear, this cavs team is far an away the best in the league. Whether OKC and CLE are both healthy or not
-
Moderator
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Originally Posted by JerrySeinfeld
You think Durant and Westbrook would be getting as shut down as Klay and Curry are by this defense?
considering how westbrook can shoot subpar games i think he would struggle with this cavs D
anybody would.
-
0.28571428571
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
LeBron wouldn't outscore Durant in the Finals and if he did it'd be on significantly worse efficiency.
Curry is playing like straight garbage and Cleveland is pulling out super close wins. This would not be happening with OKC having two guys who would clearly be playing better than anyone GS has right now.
-
I rule the local playground
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Curry is being defended into playing like garbage
The cavs have been in control of this series from the beginning
The thunder are currently no threat to the cavs, barring roster changes
-
Wilt Davis
Re: Healthy Cavs = 16-0
Originally Posted by All Net
anybody would.
Peak Shaq wouldn't.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|