Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25
  1. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    9,209

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    I think we are all in agreement with this new measurement. There's really no counterargument to this, makes sense to judge winning, as well as dominance.


    Only issue is that we need to discount weak era rings, as in my other thread it was proven it was the equivalent of winning in the second round.

    However, the metric seems strong enough, should it be an official ISH metric for ranking players all time now?
    Last edited by dubeta; 03-17-2015 at 12:23 AM.

  2. #17
    Wilt Davis Marchesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    13,851

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    FMVPs is dumb, because you have to rely on teams making the finals. Wilt against the Lakers in the 60s would have racked up much better finals stats, which would go in as estimated FMVPs.

    Hakeem with a better team for half his career would probably have a couple more FMVPs as well. Wasn't his fault Sampson got hurt and other guys were drug addicts.

  3. #18
    NBA Legend and Hall of Famer Fudge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    LA
    Posts
    22,731

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    Biggest meltdown in ISH history.

    Kobe stans in your head BAD.

    Damn.

  4. #19
    NBA Legend
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    17,125

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    Moses Malone has 4. Very impressive.

    It looks like four really is the cut-off where you start to go from noteworthy player to all-time great territory.

  5. #20
    Embiid > Jokic SouBeachTalents's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    27,376

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    Ok, so if we're counting players who would have won Finals MVP had the award been given out, here's the top 10

    1. Russell- 12
    2. Jordan- 11
    3. Mikan- 9
    4. Kareem- 8
    5. Wilt- 6
    5. Magic- 6
    5. LeBron- 6
    8. Bird- 5
    8. Duncan- 5
    10. Shaq- 4
    10. Moses- 4

  6. #21
    Wilt Davis Marchesk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    13,851

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    Quote Originally Posted by dubeta
    However, the metric seems strong enough, should it be an official ISH metric for ranking players all time now?
    No, it's not fair. Give Oscar Kareem in the 60s and we can talk. Magic was great, but he was extremely fortunate to have that Laker team to start out his career with.

  7. #22
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    9,209

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    Quote Originally Posted by SouBeachTalents
    Ok, so if we're counting players who would have won Finals MVP had the award been given out, here's the top 10

    1. Russell- 12
    2. Jordan- 11
    3. Mikan- 9
    4. Kareem- 8
    5. Wilt- 6
    5. Magic- 6
    5. LeBron- 6
    8. Bird- 5
    8. Duncan- 5
    10. Shaq- 4
    10. Moses- 4


    Now just remove all the weak era rings, as I proved 100% in this thread why they aren't valid. There were 4 teams and the best won the ring, it was easier than even making the playoffs in today's era.

    So No Russell, Wilt, Mikan

    1. Jordan

    2. Kareem

    3. LeBron

    3. Magic

    5. Bird

    Top 5 All time, whats the problem?

  8. #23
    3-time NBA All-Star
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    10,694

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    OP trying too hard..But end up as 2/5.. ..

  9. #24
    Free the banned users. stalkerforlife's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Gainesville, FL.
    Posts
    26,919

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    Best way to measure greatness is if a player sticks with one team to win lots of titles and refuses to leave his own team...twice...to form super teams.

  10. #25
    NBA lottery pick
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    5,208

    Default Re: Is MVPs + FMVPs the best way to rank players all time?

    Quote Originally Posted by stalkerforlife
    Best way to measure greatness is if a player sticks with one team to win lots of titles and refuses to leave his own team...twice...to form super teams.
    That's my GOAT.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •