East VS West record in the last 15 years

[nathanjizzle]

Dmavs is the biggest retard on this forum.

[DMAVS41]

Dmavs is the biggest retard on this forum.

You mad?

Why are you all so sensitive about this? The East sucks...it has for about 15 years now. Playing in the East is a real advantage both in the regular season and playoffs.

Both are easier in a tangible way.

Clearly the most fair system would be to take the top 16 teams in the playoffs and seed accordingly.

Your crappy East teams would still get the benefit of playing an easier schedule all regular season....they just wouldn't also get an unearned easy playoffs.

Not hard, but I'm sure nathanjizzle will come up with something to bitch about and complain like his hero.

#bitchmade

[nathanjizzle]

You mad?

yeah, at the complete bullshit you make up and argue on this forum. "wins are harder to come by in the west" "the west is so much harder than the east, every game is much more grueling"
common, the top 7 teams in the west have a better win percentange than even the 2nd seed in the east. but wins are harder to come by in the west

[DMAVS41]

yeah, at the complete bullshit you make up and argue on this forum. "wins are harder to come by in the west" "the west is so much harder than the east, every game is much more grueling"
common, the top 7 teams in the west have a better win percentange than even the 2nd seed in the east. but wins are harder to come by in the west

Because they are better!

They are the better teams....the West has a 70% win percentage against the East this year.

Is that what you aren't getting? Your best team so far, the Raptors, are about as good as the 7th best team in the West...LOL

Jesus Christ people...it's not that difficult...and the disparity will only get worse now that WB and Durant are ready to go. If you have 8 of the 10 best teams in one conference...and it's better at the bottom....the other conference is shit in comparison.

It's not just about the wins...take a look at the actual teams. It's not even comparable.

[Mr. Jabbar]

Holy shit

The way i see it lebron has no rings

[Hotlantadude81]

Name me a eastern conference star who went to the West and became more dominant....

........crickets

Now name me a western conference star who went to the east and became more dominant....

I think Al Jefferson is just the latest in that tradition

Just shows you who the real legends of the era were (Duncan, Shaq, Kobe).

Al Jefferson is not dominating this year.

[Hotlantadude81]

Because they are better!

They are the better teams....the West has a 70% win percentage against the East this year.

Is that what you aren't getting? Your best team so far, the Raptors, are about as good as the 7th best team in the West...LOL

Jesus Christ people...it's not that difficult...and the disparity will only get worse now that WB and Durant are ready to go. If you have 8 of the 10 best teams in one conference...and it's better at the bottom....the other conference is shit in comparison.

Dirk, Duncan and Kobe will be retiring soon. Perhaps that will even things up a tad more.

[DMAVS41]

Dirk, Duncan and Kobe will be retiring soon. Perhaps that will even things up a tad more.

Kobe...

But...it's not like I'm some East hater. I'd be saying the exact same shit if this was in reverse.

The best and most fair way to do this is to take the top 16 and seed accordingly...you know, actually reward teams for their regular seasons.

In no world is it fair that the Thunder have to play the Clippers while the Pacers play the Wizards in the 2nd round last year.

I can't believe people are even debating this shit..just shocking

[Bigsmoke]

Shaq singlehandedly brought that east winning percentage up by 6% in 2005

[Bigsmoke]

You mad?

Why are you all so sensitive about this? The East sucks...it has for about 15 years now. Playing in the East is a real advantage both in the regular season and playoffs.

Both are easier in a tangible way.

Clearly the most fair system would be to take the top 16 teams in the playoffs and seed accordingly.

Your crappy East teams would still get the benefit of playing an easier schedule all regular season....they just wouldn't also get an unearned easy playoffs.

Not hard, but I'm sure nathanjizzle will come up with something to bitch about and complain like his hero.

#bitchmade

But u gotta love how the 2008 Celtics and 2013 were raping those Western Conference teams throughout those regular seasons


-Both were 6-0 against TX teams
-beat the **** out of the west team that finished 1st "Celtics 2-0 vs Lakers and Heat were 2-0 vs Thunder"

Great basketball

[Bigsmoke]

Dirk, Duncan and Kobe will be retiring soon. Perhaps that will even things up a tad more.

Curry, Davis, and maybe Wiggins will take their places.

[DMAVS41]

But u gotta love how the 2008 Celtics and 2013 were raping those Western Conference teams throughout those regular seasons


-Both were 6-0 against TX teams
-beat the **** out of the west team that finished 1st "Celtics 2-0 vs Lakers and Heat were 2-0 vs Thunder"

Great basketball

Yea...nobody is denying that sometimes the best team is in the East. This is a broad conversation about overall strength and specifically the playoff teams top to bottom strength.

Obviously the 08 Celtics were the best team...same thing for the 12 Heat.

I'm actually skeptical if the 13 Heat could have won the title going through the West playoffs. With the injuries and straight up slumping of the entire team outside of Lebron during the playoffs...certainly would have been harder.

[Bigsmoke]

Yea...nobody is denying that sometimes the best team is in the East. This is a broad conversation about overall strength and specifically the playoff teams top to bottom strength.

Obviously the 08 Celtics were the best team...same thing for the 12 Heat.

I'm actually skeptical if the 13 Heat could have won the title going through the West playoffs. With the injuries and straight up slumping of the entire team outside of Lebron during the playoffs...certainly would have been harder.

For the record, the Pacers weren't some normal 49 win team. They had trouble playing without Granger and they started be beasting once PG stepped up out of no where. If they knew what they had from the beginning of the year, they would have won 55 games easy

[DMAVS41]

For the record, the Pacers weren't some normal 49 win team. They had trouble playing without Granger and they started be beasting once PG stepped up out of no where. If they knew what they had from the beginning of the year, they would have won 55 games easy

Yea...the Pacers weren't terrible or something, but a team like the Grizzlies was just better imo...and matched up as well or better than the Pacers did against the Heat also.

It's just a whole different animal having to play Lakers, Warriors, and Grizzlies like the Spurs did. I'm not sure they get through that with Wade being as hurt as he was those first two rounds.

[Mr. Jabbar]

Free tickets! Step right up and get free tickets to the NBA Finals!