Karl Malone got a 12 year old pregnant, no one cares?

[nathanjizzle]

That's right, there's no debate, sleeping with 13 year-olds is illegal.

so is parking on in a no parking zone. you will go to hell then.

[Real Men Wear Green]

so is parking on in a no parking zone. you will go to hell then.

I park legally, thanks. Get help.

[knickscity]

That's right, there's no debate, sleeping with 13 year-olds is illegal.

Seems like the parents consented after the fact, so in this case it isnt.

of course the state could have done something as well....they didnt.

No issue.

[Kblaze8855]

Ignoring for a moment the absurd discussion on it not being wrong to sleep with a 6th grader....

Old article on Karl....

He admitted being distressed by recent charges against several Portland Trail Blazers of having sex with underage girls the night before they played the Jazz at the team's two-year-old arena, the Delta Center. To Malone, it reinforced the notion that, despite Magic Johnson's misfortune, N.B.A. players are still engaging in high-risk behavior off the court.
"Nothing's changed, and you'd be surprised who's out there," he said, cryptically.

If Malone comes off as something of an archconservative, that's because he is one. This is not as much conformity to Salt Lake City, which is 92 percent white, as much as who he is, an outdoors-loving, truck-stopping, slam-dunking, all-America 29-year-old.

Malone met his wife, Kay, in a shopping mall here. They have one daughter and are expecting a second child in three weeks. His family, he said, fits right into a city tightly wound by strict moral codes. Treated With Respect

[Myth]

This is why I never understood Kobe getting so mad at Malone. When Malone said he was "hunting little Mexican girls," he obviously meant somebody much younger than Vanessa.

[Kblaze8855]

Seems like the parents consented after the fact, so in this case it isnt.

So....

A guy can allow adults to have sex with his 12 year old daughter...and its legal if shes cool with it?

That what im being told?

There is a difference between something being legal....and someone not pressing charges.

[Real Men Wear Green]

Seems like the parents consented after the fact, so in this case it isnt.

of course the state could have done something as well....they didnt.

No issue.

So if someone is raped and doesn't press charges against the rapist the rapist didn't break the law? That makes absolutely no sense. "If you can pay the parents off after the fact you can sleep with as many kids as you want to" is not a part of any law in this country.

[HomieWeMajor]

Seems like the parents consented after the fact, so in this case it isnt.

of course the state could have done something as well....they didnt.

No issue.

Knicks fan gonna Knick

[knickscity]

So....

A guy can allow adults to have sex with his 12 year old daughter...and its legal if shes cool with it?

That what im being told?

There is a difference between something being legal....and someone not pressing charges.

I plain stated it wasnt an issue. being legal or not is irrelevant.

[knickscity]

So if someone is raped and doesn't press charges against the rapist the rapist didn't break the law?

By law nothing happened.

[Real Men Wear Green]

I plain stated it wasnt an issue. being legal or not is irrelevant.

The comment of mine you replied to was, "Sleeping with 13 year-olds is illegal." Now you are saying that whether or not it's legal is irrelevant? I don't like to argue semantics but in this case that's not something to be ignored.

[Real Men Wear Green]

By law nothing happened.

Yeah this is completely wrong. Nothing was persecuted criminally. Is there some legal statement somewhere out there that says if a rapist isn't criminally prosecuted that the rape never happened? Because I'm pretty sure that isn't the case.

[knickscity]

The comment of mine you replied to was, "Sleeping with 13 year-olds is illegal." Now you are saying that whether or not it's legal is irrelevant? I don't like to argue semantics but in this case that's not something to be ignored.

Actually I was responding to someone else. You initated a dialogue with me, not the other way around.

This discussion was your response from my page 3 post about the parties "caring" to which i explained that.

The leagl aspect is determined by the parties affected and the state they reside in.

None pursued that aspect, which would have taken court procedings to decifer.

No crime was committed by law.

[knickscity]

Yeah this is completely wrong. Nothing was persecuted criminally. Is there some legal statement somewhere out there that says if a rapist isn't criminally prosecuted that the rape never happened? Because I'm pretty sure that isn't the case.

How do you know a person is raped unless they report it, and the case is investigated with a final ruling?

[Real Men Wear Green]

Actually I was responding to someone else. You initated a dialogue with me, not the other way around.

Read what you replied to. In post #63.

This discussion was your response from my page 3 post about the parties "caring" to which i explained that.

The leagl aspect is determined by the parties affected and the state they reside in.

None pursued that aspect, which would have taken court procedings to decifer.

No crime was committed by law.

So if someone steals a car and is never charged they aren't a thief? You aren't making sense.