-
Good college starter
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Originally Posted by SyRyanYang
Well, he's not wrong. They will be 1st round exit as usual.
Are you a mind reader? How the **** did you do that?
-
Reign of Error
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
So glad Dwight didn't end up on the Mavs...
-
YouGotServed
Fan in the Stands (unregistered)
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
A lot of salty people in this thread.
-
Red Nation
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Originally Posted by kennethgriffin
didnt dwight buy parsons a 200,000$ car just for getting a haircut
he's mad as f*xk
No.... he didn't buy him a car. He just let Chandler ride his for the playoffs.
-
A Humble Lebron Fan
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Jameer like a psycho ex defending mancrush Fright.
-
Jeremy Lin beat you
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
That's right, still a first round exit team
-
The go-to-guy
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
He could have remained diplomatic about the situation rather than completely trashing all of Parson's contributions. Without Parsons, the blazers probably beat the rockets more easily.
He could have said "Its unfortunate that we lost him, he was a really good player, but management is putting together a team that has a better chance of contending".
Something along those lines wouldn't have been bad at all.
-
NBA Legend
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Originally Posted by lakerfreak
He could have remained diplomatic about the situation rather than completely trashing all of Parson's contributions. Without Parsons, the blazers probably beat the rockets more easily.
He could have said "Its unfortunate that we lost him, he was a really good player, but management is putting together a team that has a better chance of contending".
Something along those lines wouldn't have been bad at all.
Go back a page. Parsons didn't play any better than Harden in that series, and Batum upped his scoring average for the series over the regular season by nearly 4 points per game.
Parsons was doo doo in that series.
Everyone was doo doo except Dwight.
-
Gambling expert
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Originally Posted by lakerfreak
He could have remained diplomatic about the situation rather than completely trashing all of Parson's contributions. Without Parsons, the blazers probably beat the rockets more easily.
He could have said "Its unfortunate that we lost him, he was a really good player, but management is putting together a team that has a better chance of contending".
Something along those lines wouldn't have been bad at all.
dwight howard should be more diplomatic? a guy that tweets free palestine and tweets to a 16 year old girl "i trusted you things i would have told nobody else"
-
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Originally Posted by Jameerthefear
what is he supposed to say? "well now were gonna suck. way to go morey."
You say "It'll be different not having Chandler on the team but I really believe our other additions will allow us to make a really big impact next year...blah...".
But Dwight is too brain-dead to even phrase his media responses correctly. What kind of an idiot doesn't know how that response would be taken? Jesus.
-
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Originally Posted by lakerfreak
He could have remained diplomatic about the situation rather than completely trashing all of Parson's contributions. Without Parsons, the blazers probably beat the rockets more easily.
He could have said "Its unfortunate that we lost him, he was a really good player, but management is putting together a team that has a better chance of contending".
Something along those lines wouldn't have been bad at all.
Howard saying the right thing to the press?? Never gonna happen
-
*****
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Originally Posted by Spaulding
I'd say Ellis and healthy Wade are better SG than Harden.
lmao ni[COLOR="Black"]ggas[/COLOR] love reaching
-
Buck Dynasty
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
Originally Posted by UK2K
Go back a page. Parsons didn't play any better than Harden in that series, and Batum upped his scoring average for the series over the regular season by nearly 4 points per game.
Parsons was doo doo in that series.
Everyone was doo doo except Dwight.
This is such bullshit.
1) Parsons was not that bad. The dude put up 19/7/2/1 on 44/36/73 shooting. If that's doo doo, you have extremely unrealistic expectations for being a fan of a team that got wrecked in the 1st round. Did you expect him to put up Lebron-type numbers? And Batum put up 16/6/5/1/1, hardly anything incredible. Parsons isn't supposed to play better than Harden..Parsons was making 900k while Harden had a ****ing max contract
2) Even if Parsons sucked hard ass against Portland, which he obviously didn't, it still doesn't justify what Dwight said. People have mentioned it multiple times in this thread..there are much better ways to deal with this situation in the media. "Chandler was a key contributor to our success last year and a great teammate, so losing him was unfortunate. But I really like the direction the front office is headed and I think we've made the moves necessary to be even better this year." It's really not that difficult.
-
Re: Dwight on Chandler Parson's departure: "It won't affect us at all"
What are the Rockets gonna do when Ariza gets old flabby and sick? (which is going to happen very soon in the near future)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|