-
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Eastern Conference Winning % (Bulls Championship Years)
1990-1991: 48.9%
1991-1992: 49.9%
1992-1993: 50.8%
1995-1996: 50.3%
1996-1997: 52.6%
1997-1998: 52.7%
Eastern Conference Winning % (Post Decision)
2010-2011: 47.1%
2011-2012: 47.9%
2012-2013: 47%
2013-2014: [COLOR="Red"]43.2%[/COLOR]
Red= 2nd Lowest Eastern conference % ever.
The East this year also posted the lowest ever H2H winning percentage (37%) against the West.
Come On Son
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...t-version-ever
http://nba.si.com/2013/12/05/histori...stern-western/
^If that's an indication of 'Jordan mythology' then Bron Bron's on some Paul Bunyan, Wilt Chamberlain type shit.
-
... on a leash
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by deja vu
People put * on LeBron's titles because of that collusion thing.
I don't care about what conference he belongs. After all, the NBA champion is the champion of the entire NBA, not just the East (or West).
Well as multiple times proven, the collusion thing would only be a moral problem people have.... again, individuals cannot collude, go read a dictionary of the word's definition.
-
Local High School Star
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
-
... on a leash
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by sportjames23
Oh, because the Bulls beat the Pistons in 1991, they were past their prime, huh? They were the two-time defending champs.
Boston was still good (had one of the top records in the East in 1991). The Knicks and Cavs were very good in the early 90s, as were the Hawks. The Bucks were a solid team still, and the Pacers and Heat came along from the mid-90s to the end of the decade.
The East of the 90s (as well as the NBA as a whole in the 90s) was far stronger than the pathetic piece of shit it is today. Ya'll haters just gonna have to accept that fact.
So whenever you don't post your rolling smileys, you fail horribly I see?
The 1991 Pistons were quite clearly past their prime, and so were the Celtics... Bird and the Team themself said, with that record, they wouldn't have done shit in the 80's... Your boy played in the weaker conference.
Both teams didnt matter during MJ's reign.
Now you want to have REGGIE MILLER'S Pacers, DAUGHERTY's Cavs, as Competition?
Good one. It was a poor conference. accept it.
-
College superstar
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by DonDadda59
Eastern Conference Winning % (Bulls Championship Years)
1990-1991: 48.9%
1991-1992: 49.9%
1992-1993: 50.8%
1995-1996: 50.3%
1996-1997: 52.6%
1997-1998: 52.7%
Eastern Conference Winning % (Post Decision)
2010-2011: 47.1%
2011-2012: 47.9%
2012-2013: 47%
2013-2014: [COLOR="Red"]43.2%[/COLOR]
Red= 2nd Lowest Eastern conference % ever.
The East this year also posted the lowest ever H2H winning percentage (37%) against the West.
Come On Son
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...t-version-ever
http://nba.si.com/2013/12/05/histori...stern-western/
^If that's an indication of 'Jordan mythology' then Bron Bron's on some Paul Bunyan, Wilt Chamberlain type shit.
all these stats (not just yours, in general) yet the East's team is the defending champions 2 years running...the arguments have no merit if they (the West) cannot finish the deed to the end. it's pretty simple to grasp, really...all this "strength of the west" talk yet they fall short of the title...pretty embarrassing, no?
-
... on a leash
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by DonDadda59
Eastern Conference Winning % (Bulls Championship Years)
1990-1991: 48.9%
1991-1992: 49.9%
1992-1993: 50.8%
1995-1996: 50.3%
1996-1997: 52.6%
1997-1998: 52.7%
Eastern Conference Winning % (Post Decision)
2010-2011: 47.1%
2011-2012: 47.9%
2012-2013: 47%
2013-2014: [COLOR="Red"]43.2%[/COLOR]
Red= 2nd Lowest Eastern conference % ever.
The East this year also posted the lowest ever H2H winning percentage (37%) against the West.
Come On Son
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...t-version-ever
http://nba.si.com/2013/12/05/histori...stern-western/
^If that's an indication of 'Jordan mythology' then Bron Bron's on some Paul Bunyan, Wilt Chamberlain type shit.
I'm trying to figure out a difference between the 2?
How can it be the worst head to head against the West, but only the 2nd worst EC winning % ever?
-
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by wally_world
In 20 years aint nobody gonna remember how weak the East was
Don't bet on it. People still remember how weak the 80's West was nearly 30 years later.
-
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by DonDadda59
Eastern Conference Winning % (Bulls Championship Years)
1990-1991: 48.9%
1991-1992: 49.9%
1992-1993: 50.8%
1995-1996: 50.3%
1996-1997: 52.6%
1997-1998: 52.7%
Eastern Conference Winning % (Post Decision)
2010-2011: 47.1%
2011-2012: 47.9%
2012-2013: 47%
2013-2014: [COLOR="Red"]43.2%[/COLOR]
Red= 2nd Lowest Eastern conference % ever.
The East this year also posted the lowest ever H2H winning percentage (37%) against the West.
Come On Son
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2...t-version-ever
http://nba.si.com/2013/12/05/histori...stern-western/
^If that's an indication of 'Jordan mythology' then Bron Bron's on some Paul Bunyan, Wilt Chamberlain type shit.
now post the playoff win percentages
-
ISH vigilant
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by ArbitraryWater
So whenever you don't post your rolling smileys, you fail horribly I see?
The 1991 Pistons were quite clearly past their prime, and so were the Celtics... Bird and the Team themself said, with that record, they wouldn't have done shit in the 80's... Your boy played in the weaker conference.
Both teams didnt matter during MJ's reign.
Now you want to have REGGIE MILLER'S Pacers, DAUGHERTY's Cavs, as Competition?
Good one. It was a poor conference. accept it.
You speak as if you are old enough to have seen Reggie's Pacers.
Ask any Indiana fan who was old enough and they'd tell you that Pacers team would have eviscerated the current dross that the Heat have found challenging thr past few years.
-
Serious playground baller
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by NumberSix
Two words.....
Jordan mythology
Yeah, 33/6/5 __average__ is just a myth.
Chris Paul has one game with those stats and the stans go ape shit.
-
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by Mr Feeny
You speak as if you are old enough to have seen Reggie's Pacers.
Ask any Indiana fan who was old enough and they'd tell you that Pacers team would have eviscerated the current dross that the Heat have found challenging thr past few years.
when reggie miller is your best player,that doesnt exactly speak volumes.
-
NBA Superstar
-
College star
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Bc he beat all those West conf. teams in the finals 6 times in 6 games or less.
-
ISH vigilant
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Originally Posted by mehyaM24
when reggie miller is your best player,that doesnt exactly speak volumes.
When Billups is ur best player, u shouldn't be destroying a team with 4 hall of famers.
Right back at you.
-
Serious playground baller
Re: How come no one ever discredits MJs rings when he played in the East ?
Early 90s ... Detroit .. Bad Boys
Mid 90s ... Knicks ... multiple 55+ win seasons.
Late 90s ... Pacers ... multiple 50+ win seasons.
OP too busy shitting his diapers in the 90s to know anything about basketball.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|