Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32
  1. #1
    Is it in you? hateraid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    In your local 7-11 freezers
    Posts
    18,739

    Default 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    Taking out Micheal Jordan and Kobe Bryant out of the equation which era shooting gaurds where better:

    Early to mid 90's:

    Clyde Drexler
    Reggie Miller
    Mitch Richmond
    Joe Dumars
    Latrell Sprewell

    vs

    Early to mid 00's:

    Allen Iverson
    Dwyane Wade
    Ray Allen
    Manu Ginobili
    Vince Carter

  2. #2
    Good college starter Rubio2Gasol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3,353

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    I'd say 00's edge it on that.

  3. #3
    NBA sixth man of the year
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Naptown aka Indianapolis
    Posts
    7,007

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    For the 90's you're leaving out Eddie Jones, Steve Smith, Jeff Hornacek, Dan Majerle, Allan Houston, Jimmy Jackson, Kendall Gill, Hersey Hawkins, and John Starks, and you might even throw Nick Anderson in there...They are not stars but when talking about depth, there's a good case for the 90's...

    For the 2000's, you're leaving off Brandon Roy, Michael Redd, Richard Hamilton, Joe Johnson, Michael Finley, Kevin Martin, and Jerry Stackhouse...

    Now looking at the whole picture, there's depth with both decades. If you look at today, the SG position has really fell off...

    Edit - Forgot Monta Ellis for the 2000's..

  4. #4
    Good college starter Relinquish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    3,252

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    Quote Originally Posted by Dro
    For the 90's you're leaving out Steve Smith, Jeff Hornacek, Dan Majerle, Allan Houston, Jimmy Jackson, Kendall Gill, Hersey Hawkins, and John Starks, and you might even throw Nick Anderson in there...They are not stars but when talking about depth, there's a good case for the 90's...

    For the 2000's, you're leaving off Brandon Roy, Michael Redd, Richard Hamilton, Joe Johnson, Michael Finley, Kevin Martin, and Jerry Stackhouse...

    Now looking at the whole picture, there's depth with both decades. If you look at today, the SG position has really fell off...
    John Starks wasn't even that good

  5. #5
    NBA sixth man of the year
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Naptown aka Indianapolis
    Posts
    7,007

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    Quote Originally Posted by Relinquish
    John Starks wasn't even that good
    Do you ever contribute anything to any thread? John Starks certainly was good..He's just as good as any of those other 2nd/3rd tier SG's I listed...He played on a slow pace Knicks squad and was still a good scorer with pretty good defense...

  6. #6
    Local High School Star robert_shaww's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,732

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    Quote Originally Posted by hateraid
    Taking out Micheal Jordan and Kobe Bryant out of the equation which era shooting gaurds where better:

    Early to mid 90's:

    Clyde Drexler 1 ring
    Reggie Miller 0
    Mitch Richmond 0
    Joe Dumars (0 rings in the 90s)
    Latrell Sprewell 0

    vs

    Early to mid 00's:

    Allen Iverson 0
    Dwyane Wade 1
    Ray Allen 0
    Manu Ginobili 3
    Vince Carter 0

    4 vs 1.

    because of Ginobili, give me the 00s

  7. #7
    Is it in you? hateraid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    In your local 7-11 freezers
    Posts
    18,739

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    Quote Originally Posted by Dro
    For the 90's you're leaving out Eddie Jones, Steve Smith, Jeff Hornacek, Dan Majerle, Allan Houston, Jimmy Jackson, Kendall Gill, Hersey Hawkins, and John Starks, and you might even throw Nick Anderson in there...They are not stars but when talking about depth, there's a good case for the 90's...

    For the 2000's, you're leaving off Brandon Roy, Michael Redd, Richard Hamilton, Joe Johnson, Michael Finley, Kevin Martin, and Jerry Stackhouse...

    Now looking at the whole picture, there's depth with both decades. If you look at today, the SG position has really fell off...

    Edit - Forgot Monta Ellis for the 2000's..
    I went with a top 5 to shorten the list just because these were the more impactful players of the time. But this thread is not exclusive with just these players

  8. #8
    NBA sixth man of the year
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Naptown aka Indianapolis
    Posts
    7,007

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    Quote Originally Posted by hateraid
    I went with a top 5 to shorten the list just because these were the more impactful players of the time. But this thread is not exclusive with just these players
    Yeah, I figured you were going for the top 5 best players...I just wanted to round it out so we can get a full picture...But honestly, its almost a tossup...Good thread by the way... +rep

  9. #9
    Good college starter Relinquish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Baltimore
    Posts
    3,252

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    Quote Originally Posted by Dro
    Do you ever contribute anything to any thread? John Starks certainly was good..He's just as good as any of those other 2nd/3rd tier SG's I listed...He played on a slow pace Knicks squad and was still a good scorer with pretty good defense...
    What do you want me to say? 00 is clearly better and there's no argument for the 90s. Starks played well in the playoffs but he was still probably the worst guard listed by a good margin.
    Last edited by Relinquish; 05-05-2014 at 01:09 PM.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    14,477

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    its stupid to say "shooting guard" since allot of guys in the 2000's were do it all wings who brought the ball up. scored like a shooting guard and could drive

    positions back in the 80's and 90's were more "pg pass first" "sg outsite shooter" and "sf post player"


    if you look at wing players ( do it all guys who played outside allot of the time and scored like a shooting guard ) then you'l find the 2000's had far superior talent

    guys like kobe/lebron guard each other... so whats a position really mean in the box score


    i'd put melo/kd/bron/pierce and a ton more on that list

  11. #11
    NBA All-star jstern's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    9,966

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    It's interesting, because I think Allen Iverson and I think of the 90s. He was such a main player when I think back to 96, 97, 98, 99. Then the year 2000 comes, if you put yourself in that moment, it's hard to associate Iverson in the 2000s, even though he played more years there. Ray Allen too, but he wasn't as big as Iverson.

  12. #12
    National High School Star Jlamb47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    2,156

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    00
    A.1 DWade Ginobli

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,989

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    let's be honest, how many of us watched prime dumars or prime clyde for more than a few torrent games or youtube videos? hard to judge, we all know they are all time greats and this makes it even harder to judge. also most of them were drafted one decade earlier

  14. #14
    NBA sixth man of the year
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Naptown aka Indianapolis
    Posts
    7,007

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    Quote Originally Posted by Relinquish
    What do you want me to say? 00 is clearly better and there's no argument for the 90s. Starks played well in the playoffs but he was still probably the worst guard listed by a good margin.
    Well, this is a better analysis than "durp, durp, John Starks was not that good "..All I ask for is reasoning to back up your beliefs...I don't have to agree with it...

  15. #15
    Local High School Star houston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    1,400

    Default Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds

    90's was a weak era when it came to the wings. 2000's greatest era when it came to wings ever.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •