-
Is it in you?
90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
Taking out Micheal Jordan and Kobe Bryant out of the equation which era shooting gaurds where better:
Early to mid 90's:
Clyde Drexler
Reggie Miller
Mitch Richmond
Joe Dumars
Latrell Sprewell
vs
Early to mid 00's:
Allen Iverson
Dwyane Wade
Ray Allen
Manu Ginobili
Vince Carter
-
Good college starter
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
I'd say 00's edge it on that.
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
For the 90's you're leaving out Eddie Jones, Steve Smith, Jeff Hornacek, Dan Majerle, Allan Houston, Jimmy Jackson, Kendall Gill, Hersey Hawkins, and John Starks, and you might even throw Nick Anderson in there...They are not stars but when talking about depth, there's a good case for the 90's...
For the 2000's, you're leaving off Brandon Roy, Michael Redd, Richard Hamilton, Joe Johnson, Michael Finley, Kevin Martin, and Jerry Stackhouse...
Now looking at the whole picture, there's depth with both decades. If you look at today, the SG position has really fell off...
Edit - Forgot Monta Ellis for the 2000's..
-
Good college starter
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
Originally Posted by Dro
For the 90's you're leaving out Steve Smith, Jeff Hornacek, Dan Majerle, Allan Houston, Jimmy Jackson, Kendall Gill, Hersey Hawkins, and John Starks, and you might even throw Nick Anderson in there...They are not stars but when talking about depth, there's a good case for the 90's...
For the 2000's, you're leaving off Brandon Roy, Michael Redd, Richard Hamilton, Joe Johnson, Michael Finley, Kevin Martin, and Jerry Stackhouse...
Now looking at the whole picture, there's depth with both decades. If you look at today, the SG position has really fell off...
John Starks wasn't even that good
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
Originally Posted by Relinquish
John Starks wasn't even that good
Do you ever contribute anything to any thread? John Starks certainly was good..He's just as good as any of those other 2nd/3rd tier SG's I listed...He played on a slow pace Knicks squad and was still a good scorer with pretty good defense...
-
Local High School Star
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
Originally Posted by hateraid
Taking out Micheal Jordan and Kobe Bryant out of the equation which era shooting gaurds where better:
Early to mid 90's:
Clyde Drexler 1 ring
Reggie Miller 0
Mitch Richmond 0
Joe Dumars (0 rings in the 90s)
Latrell Sprewell 0
vs
Early to mid 00's:
Allen Iverson 0
Dwyane Wade 1
Ray Allen 0
Manu Ginobili 3
Vince Carter 0
4 vs 1.
because of Ginobili, give me the 00s
-
Is it in you?
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
Originally Posted by Dro
For the 90's you're leaving out Eddie Jones, Steve Smith, Jeff Hornacek, Dan Majerle, Allan Houston, Jimmy Jackson, Kendall Gill, Hersey Hawkins, and John Starks, and you might even throw Nick Anderson in there...They are not stars but when talking about depth, there's a good case for the 90's...
For the 2000's, you're leaving off Brandon Roy, Michael Redd, Richard Hamilton, Joe Johnson, Michael Finley, Kevin Martin, and Jerry Stackhouse...
Now looking at the whole picture, there's depth with both decades. If you look at today, the SG position has really fell off...
Edit - Forgot Monta Ellis for the 2000's..
I went with a top 5 to shorten the list just because these were the more impactful players of the time. But this thread is not exclusive with just these players
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
Originally Posted by hateraid
I went with a top 5 to shorten the list just because these were the more impactful players of the time. But this thread is not exclusive with just these players
Yeah, I figured you were going for the top 5 best players...I just wanted to round it out so we can get a full picture...But honestly, its almost a tossup...Good thread by the way... +rep
-
Good college starter
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
Originally Posted by Dro
Do you ever contribute anything to any thread? John Starks certainly was good..He's just as good as any of those other 2nd/3rd tier SG's I listed...He played on a slow pace Knicks squad and was still a good scorer with pretty good defense...
What do you want me to say? 00 is clearly better and there's no argument for the 90s. Starks played well in the playoffs but he was still probably the worst guard listed by a good margin.
Last edited by Relinquish; 05-05-2014 at 01:09 PM.
-
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
its stupid to say "shooting guard" since allot of guys in the 2000's were do it all wings who brought the ball up. scored like a shooting guard and could drive
positions back in the 80's and 90's were more "pg pass first" "sg outsite shooter" and "sf post player"
if you look at wing players ( do it all guys who played outside allot of the time and scored like a shooting guard ) then you'l find the 2000's had far superior talent
guys like kobe/lebron guard each other... so whats a position really mean in the box score
i'd put melo/kd/bron/pierce and a ton more on that list
-
NBA All-star
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
It's interesting, because I think Allen Iverson and I think of the 90s. He was such a main player when I think back to 96, 97, 98, 99. Then the year 2000 comes, if you put yourself in that moment, it's hard to associate Iverson in the 2000s, even though he played more years there. Ray Allen too, but he wasn't as big as Iverson.
-
National High School Star
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
-
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
let's be honest, how many of us watched prime dumars or prime clyde for more than a few torrent games or youtube videos? hard to judge, we all know they are all time greats and this makes it even harder to judge. also most of them were drafted one decade earlier
-
NBA sixth man of the year
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
Originally Posted by Relinquish
What do you want me to say? 00 is clearly better and there's no argument for the 90s. Starks played well in the playoffs but he was still probably the worst guard listed by a good margin.
Well, this is a better analysis than "durp, durp, John Starks was not that good "..All I ask for is reasoning to back up your beliefs...I don't have to agree with it...
-
Local High School Star
Re: 90's shooting gaurds vs 00's shooting gaurds
90's was a weak era when it came to the wings. 2000's greatest era when it came to wings ever.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|