Page 3 of 18 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 261
  1. #31
    #Trump4Treason nathanjizzle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Posts
    14,705

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    too many dumb monkeys on this forum. You cant teach an idiot knowledge if there not capable of understanding and containing that knowledge.

  2. #32
    High School Varsity 6th Man entropy35's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    752

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    I think most people know Wade is the better player, but kobe is the better winner. That is why people put Kobe over wade.

  3. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Posts
    29,309

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Kobe: 4 more rings, more MVPs more final MVPs, more all NBA first teams, more All NBA Defense teams, more Allstar teams, 81 points


    Wade: Better stats

    you decide who you want

    This is actually the only game I ever went to at Staples, its so expensive but my dad got tickets for my birthday. In the end is a perfect illustration why Kobe is better than Wade. He does whatever it takes to win and comes up huge when it matter WITHOUT ref bailouts

    Enjoy this clip, still gives me chills to this day
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-3s90fR1ak
    Last edited by Nick Young; 10-28-2011 at 04:29 AM.

  4. #34
    College superstar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    4,592

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant


  5. #35
    Championship or bust Cali Syndicate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Lone Star State
    Posts
    3,853

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanjizzle
    look, i dont even want to argue about this stupid shit because im correct.

    the OP gives a misconstrued perception comparison of both players stats. kobe entered at 18 with only 4 years of highschool experience...dwyane wade came in with 3 years of college. If you wanted to be fair you have to factor that in or atleast consider it. Also kobes past prime numbers are already calculated.....wades past prime numbers are only partially calculated.

    So comparing Kobe at age 22 after 4 years in the NBA to Wade as a rookie is FAIR?

    LOL at your unbiased fairness. Talk about an oxymoron.

    And FYI Wade only spent TWO YEARS at Marquette.

  6. #36
    Championship or bust Cali Syndicate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    The Lone Star State
    Posts
    3,853

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanjizzle
    yea thats exactly wat i said.
    Uh no you weren't. If you truly believed people matured differently, than you wouldn't be using AGE as the reason for your assessment.

  7. #37
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,359

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by entropy35
    I think most people know Wade is the better player, but kobe is the better winner. That is why people put Kobe over wade.
    Actually, the consensus is Prime Kobe> Prime Wade.

  8. #38
    B-Eazy Mike Beasley MichaelCheazley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,409

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by Nick Young

    Enjoy this clip, still gives me chills to this day
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-3s90fR1ak
    Do you realize how mediocre the heat were back then? That game shouldnt have even been close enough to be determined by one shot. We started q rich, jermaine and carlos arroyo. All of this kobe buzzer beater hype is stupid considering most of the teams he hits buzzer beaters on are teams that shouldnt even be in games close enough to be decided by a buzzer beater considering Kobe's team.

  9. #39
    ............ D-Wade316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    In your <3
    Posts
    4,301

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanjizzle
    do it.
    Regular season:
    26.81ppg on 19.14fga, 48.83fg%, 50.46efg%, 57.25ts%
    25.4ppg on 18.4fga, 48.5fg%, 50.0efg%, 56.7ts%
    5.34rpg
    4.9rpg
    6.54apg
    6.1apg

    Playoffs:
    27.47ppg on 19.43fga, 48.97fg%, 51.25efg%, 58.17ts%
    25.9ppg on 18.77fga%, 48.3fg%, 50.2efg%, 57.0ts%
    6.11rpg
    5.7rpg
    5.54apg
    5.6apg

    Bolded ones are without his rookie year, 2007 playoffs, and 2007-2008 regular season.
    Last edited by D-Wade316; 10-28-2011 at 06:47 AM.

  10. #40
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,359

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    lol. "kobe's teams"

    Wade couldn't even win with the best player in the league and another perennial All-Star PF.


  11. #41
    ............ D-Wade316's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    In your <3
    Posts
    4,301

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by Jacks3
    lol. "kobe's teams"

    Wade couldn't even win with the best player in the league and another perennial All-Star PF.

    Prime Shaq>Prime Lebron & Wade.


    Kobe can't win with prime Shaq in 04.

  12. #42
    B-Eazy Mike Beasley MichaelCheazley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    1,409

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Kobe couldnt win with a Prime shaq, and very servicable Malone and payton. And it WAS mostly his fault why they lost.Also the heat trio have been together one year AND made the finals when people said they wont get past the celtics or bulls. Heck one of the turds here said philly had a chance of beating them if they took game 1. I see alot of distress for you in the upcoming years as this Heat trio is bound to do some damage. The most positive news you'll get with kobe on the other hand is that "he is back", "random obscure surgery heals him","tim grover" blah blah blah. Keep making excuses to make yourself feel better. Fact is your hero got swept by the same team that beat the Heat.
    Last edited by MichaelCheazley; 10-28-2011 at 07:02 AM.

  13. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    6,561

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelCheazley
    Kobe couldnt win with a Prime shaq, and very servicable Malone and payton. And it WAS mostly his fault why they lost.Also the heat trio have been together one year AND made the finals when people said they wont get past the celtics or bulls. Heck one of the turds here said philly had a chance of beating them if they took game 1. I see alot of distress for you in the upcoming years as this Heat trio is bound to do some damage. The most positive news you'll get with kobe on the other hand is that "he is back", "random obscure surgery heals him","tim grover" blah blah blah. Keep making excuses to make yourself feel better. Fact is your hero got swept by the same team that beat the Heat.
    very serviceable? are you retarded? payton averaged 4 pts on 30% and malone was injured

  14. #44
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,359

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by D-Wade316
    Prime Shaq>Prime Lebron & Wade.


    Kobe can't win with prime Shaq in 04.
    Shaq wasn't in his prime in 2004.

    BTW, he won three straight titles with Shaq and made another Finals.

    Wade with the best in the league and another All-Star PF couldn't even beat a one-man team.


  15. #45
    Very good NBA starter
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    8,359

    Default Re: Statistical Evidence says Wade > Bryant

    Quote Originally Posted by MichaelCheazley
    Kobe couldnt win with a Prime shaq, and very servicable Malone and payton. And it WAS mostly his fault why they lost.
    Yeah, it's all his fault Malone was injured and the rest of the Lakers outside Shaq shot 33%. I didn't know one player could cause a team to lose by a average margin of 15 PPG. Is that why the biggest blow-out loss by far came in the game where he only took 12 shots?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •