-
NBA Superstar
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by Heavincent
Maybe that was his sister or cousin in Colorado ...
I just don't get it honestly.
I mean LeBron is top twenty, for sure ...
But two spots down from Bryant?
Really?
-
phal5
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by Samurai Swoosh
You don't take exception with Oscar being in the top ten?
I don't because he views him like LeBron - a stat-padding junkie. I should have added his bias for LeBron, but that goes hand in hand with his distaste for Bryant.
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by catch24
I don't because he views him like LeBron - a stat-padding junkie.
Good point. haha
You think if that were the case though, he'd have Pippen way higher too.
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Hell, I could see much more of a case for Lebron being over Oscar than Oscar being top 10.
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by ShaqAttack3234
Hell, I could see much more of a case for Lebron being over Oscar than Oscar being top 10.
Uh, me too.
-
NBA Superstar
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by Samurai Swoosh
Maybe that was his sister or cousin in Colorado ...
I just don't get it honestly.
I mean LeBron is top twenty, for sure ...
But two spots down from Bryant?
Really?
There is absolutely no evidence that would put Lebron anywhere near Kobe in terms of career accomplishments. Lebron just isn't even close.
Jason Kidd at #44 is also incredibly stupid. He is a top 25 player at worse.
Last edited by Heavincent; 06-18-2011 at 04:55 PM.
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by ShaqAttack3234
Hell, I could see much more of a case for Lebron being over Oscar than Oscar being top 10.
where do you have Jerry West then?
-
Local High School Star
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Blitz is like Patton Oswalt in the movie Big Fan.
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by magnax1
where do you have Jerry West then?
Somewhere in the top 11-15 range. Probably 12. I might put Mikan 11 ignoring the fact that I doubt he could compete in later eras and just including him because his play vs his peers would make him top 10 and how much he changed the game.
-
phal5
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by Samurai Swoosh
You think if that were the case though, he'd have Pippen way higher too.
You consider Pipp a stat buffer?
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by ShaqAttack3234
Somewhere in the top 11-15 range. Probably 12. I might put Mikan 11 ignoring the fact that I doubt he could compete in later eras and just including him because his play vs his peers would make him top 10 and how much he changed the game.
Well I just wondered because everything I've read said Oscar was pretty consistently better in their best years, and statistically it's true too. So I don't really get why you think it's so terrible to have Oscar borderline top 10.
Of course I've only watched like 3 games of oscar, so it's not really a fair assessment.
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by catch24
You consider Pipp a stat buffer?
No, but he filled a lot of stat columns. I legit believe LeBron is a fluffer of his stats. Oscar probably was too. He wasn't a winner, either.
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by magnax1
Well I just wondered because everything I've read said Oscar was pretty consistently better in their best years, and statistically it's true too. So I don't really get why you think it's so terrible to have Oscar borderline top 10.
Of course I've only watched like 3 games of oscar, so it's not really a fair assessment.
Because he never won till he piggy backed Lou Alcindor
-
Re: Bruce Blitz'a Top 50 Players of All Time
Originally Posted by magnax1
Well I just wondered because everything I've read said Oscar was pretty consistently better in their best years, and statistically it's true too. So I don't really get why you think it's so terrible to have Oscar borderline top 10.
Of course I've only watched like 3 games of oscar, so it's not really a fair assessment.
Oscar won a total of 2 playoff series when he was the man, I believe and thats around a decade...with just 2 playoff series wins.
West was at least contending every year, won a title as arguably the best player(or certainly closer to Wilt than Oscar was to Kareem), would have won in '69 had Wilt and Baylor showed up at all, and this is legit considering West won finals MVP on the losing team in a close 7 game series.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|