So what happens to Farmar now?
Results 16 to 30 of 197
Thread: Steve Blake to the Lakers.
-
07-02-2010, 06:40 PM #167-time NBA All-Star
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- Brooklyn
- Posts
- 12,124
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
-
07-02-2010, 06:41 PM #17Serious playground baller
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 496
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
Blake is a fundamentally sound PG with good shooting range. He played well when he was with the Nuggets. I still don't understand why they let him go.
-
07-02-2010, 06:41 PM #18Palm Trees & Gangsters
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Los Angeles
- Posts
- 7,261
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
blake>>>>>>>farmar or brown that's all u need to know
-
07-02-2010, 06:41 PM #19InsideGameFan in the Stands (unregistered) Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
I really wanted Mike Miller, can someone tell me if it's still possible to sign him? I'm not quite sure how the salary caps or any of that works.
Thanks!
-
07-02-2010, 06:41 PM #20NBA All-star
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- LA
- Posts
- 9,767
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
He's long gone, been talking about starting next year and flat out said he wants to leave
Originally Posted by OneMoreSucka
-
07-02-2010, 06:42 PM #21NBA All-star
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- LA
- Posts
- 9,767
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
No more room, the only way it would happen is through a sign&trade Originally Posted by InsideGame
What if we did a sign/trade with Farmar and Blake?? That would leave us with the MLE to spend still... (crossing fingers)
-
07-02-2010, 06:42 PM #22Local High School Star
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Posts
- 1,058
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
Will he start over Fisher?
-
07-02-2010, 06:42 PM #23LFC|JAYS|RAPS|VIKES
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 11,582
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
-
07-02-2010, 06:43 PM #24NBA Legend
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Torrance, CA
- Posts
- 14,897
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
If this signing if true, Farmar is more than gone. Farmar was gone anyway, and I do not believe LA has any real interest in keeping him either.
Blake is leaps and bounds better anyway. A smarter player in general.
-
07-02-2010, 06:44 PM #25(no Dirk homer)
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 3,006
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
I think he is a good fit for the Lakers. A 6.3 pointguard who shoots 3 pointers and can also play ball. How would you guys rate his defense?
-
07-02-2010, 06:45 PM #26And Another One
- Join Date
- Nov 2007
- Posts
- 2,170
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
Good move.
Originally Posted by PistolPete
This signing gives the team three points. I'm sure Farmar is moving. Whether or not Derek starts, he's ending his career as a Laker.
-
07-02-2010, 06:47 PM #27Banned
- Join Date
- May 2009
- Posts
- 6,561
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
Why do people think we can't get both Miller and Blake?
-
07-02-2010, 06:48 PM #28Magic Johnson
- Join Date
- Oct 2008
- Posts
- 13,206
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
Wow; great signing! I guess this means that we're not going after Mike Miller anymore, unless the Wizards want Vujacic, Walton, Farmar, or Brown in a sign and trade.
-
07-02-2010, 06:48 PM #29Good college starter
- Join Date
- Jan 2010
- Posts
- 3,188
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
Do the Lakers even have a weakness anymore? Now their bench has Fisher Brown Odom which is adequate. How the f*ck can anyone beat them without teaming up the Free Agents 3?
-
07-02-2010, 06:49 PM #30Very good NBA starter
- Join Date
- Jun 2006
- Posts
- 8,602
Re: Steve Black to the Lakers.
Good. This dramatically improves the PG play and shooting with one player. That is the way it should be done
Reply With Quote
