Pau Gasol vs. Scottie Pippen - who is the better second fiddle?

[hall of fame]

Pau Gasol vs. Scottie Pippen

Who is better and more dominant out of these two second fiddles?

Which one would lead a team to more wins as the "main man" assuming both had equally talented rosters?

[juju151111]

Scottie Pippen is better.

[Bigsmoke]

they are too different...

... but i guess i rather have Pippen on my team... then against Paul Gasol did the impossible with the Grizzles before...

not sure... i guess Gasol since he help the Lakers win 65 games while Bynum was out nearly half the year.

[L.Kizzle]

LOL

[KubiliusF]

No Pau no Ring

[DuMa]

depends on who is your first option is.

[hall of fame]

they are too different...

... but i guess i rather have Pippen on my team... then against Paul Gasol did the impossible with the Grizzles before...

not sure... i guess Gasol since he help the Lakers win 65 games while Bynum was out nearly half the year.

Good point. Bynum stinks and Gasol was able to prove that he was the much better player.

This debate between Pippen and Gasol is very close. Pippen's career looks more accomplished, but Ewing, Barkley or Malone could have gone from ringless to having plenty of rings playing next to Jordan, who was much better than Wilt and Kareem.

[L.Kizzle]

Good point. Bynum stinks and Gasol was able to prove that he was the much better player.

This debate between Pippen and Gasol is very close. Pippen's career looks more accomplished, but Ewing, Barkley or Malone could have gone from ringless to having plenty of rings playing next to Jordan, who was much better than Wilt and Kareem.

Are we comparing Pau to Ewing and Barkley. He's not even on Tom Chambers level.

[Bodhi]

As a first option, Scottie Pippen no question. Gasol couldn't win a single playoff game as the first first option.

As the second option, it's a lot closer and depends on the kind of player you have as your number one. Pippen can be your primary ball handler, which helps if your first option doesn't need to have the ball in his hands but less important otherwise.

Pippen is obviously the better player and he complimented Jordan better than Gasol would have. But I think that Gasol works better with Kobe than Pippen would have. Different players need different things.

[loot]

whoa now... am i missing sarcasm here? pippen vs pow? jc

[Enigmatism]

LOL

What he said^

[T-bomb 25]

Are we comparing Pau to Ewing and Barkley. He's not even on Tom Chambers level.

This,but Chambers was a beast though.

[Maniak]

whoa now... am i missing sarcasm here? pippen vs pow? jc

The OP is BULLS(hit) . I think that sums that up.

And Pimpin Pippen all phucking day.

[L.Kizzle]

This,but Chambers was a beast though.

Exacly. Hell, is he even Tom Gugliotta or Danny Manning??

[T-bomb 25]

Good point. Bynum stinks and Gasol was able to prove that he was the much better player.

This debate between Pippen and Gasol is very close. Pippen's career looks more accomplished, but Ewing, Barkley or Malone could have gone from ringless to having plenty of rings playing next to Jordan, who was much better than Wilt and Kareem.

Your a moron,Malone,Barkley,and Ewings are superstar ATG's, Pippen is the greatest second fiddle of all time at least in the modern era,and he's knowwhere any of them as a 1st option,get real and stop sniffin the glue,you should'nt even be bringing them up with Pippen.