-
Another Laker Dynasty?
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
excellent. at 6/$50m that means he is their starting power forward.
Shaq and AndyV in the post.
foolish move. AndyV is not a threat from 15 feet. that much easier to double Shaq...if necessary.
that will be an ugly contract in a couple years....unless he develops some offensive skill.
-
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Originally Posted by InspiredLebowski
He's into that sorta thing?
That's the only reason I can think of for why so many people are talking about a video of him today.
-
An uglier Lamar Doom
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Originally Posted by wang4three
He's gonna be a nice expirer in a 5 years.
now that is a positive attitude. Wow, Im really shocked. They coulda had milsap for that or freaking bass and dice. I know they did it after dice committed to SA, but god damn, what a terrible move.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Originally Posted by ElPigto
Didn't see this coming. This is like a poor man's Rashard Lewis deal.
Good way of putting it.
This is seriously shooting yourself in the foot. You don't play a guy like Varejao that kind of money, you just don't.
-
Fire Byron
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
This is a such a shame. Varejo is making close to 8.5mil a year. 8.5mil for what? His 8 points and 7 rebounds that he gets a game? Artest is getting paid the MLE (6mil a year) for 15 points, 4+ boards and 4+ assists that he dishes per game. Sheed is almost making approximately that much annually with the Celtics and despite having a horrible playoff performance last year he still managed to averaged 12+ points a game and 7+ boards a game. Sheed can also hit threes and provides veteran leadership.
I know Cleveland is paying Varejo for the projected player that he is suppose to be but I just don't project Varejo being worth that much.
Last edited by triangleoffense; 07-08-2009 at 11:33 PM.
-
An uglier Lamar Doom
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Originally Posted by triangleoffense
This is a such a shame. Varejo is making close to 8.5mil a year. 8.5mil for what? His 8 points and 7 rebounds that he gets a game? Artest is getting paid the MLE (6mil a year) for 15 points, 4+ boards and 4+ assists that he dishes per game. Sheed is almost making approximately that much annually with the Celtics and despite having a horrible playoff performance last year he still managed to averaged 12+ points a game and 7+ boards a game. Sheed can also hit threes and provides veteran leadership.
but they couldnt get sheed. and they couldnt get dice. so they panicked
-
Stare
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
F you, Krusty!!!! I just got paid!!!!!!
-
Roy Hibbert Super Star
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
So obviously Cleveland is saying all or nothing, 2010 is the title year. Who's left out there for the MLE?
-
Waiting on 2010....
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Originally Posted by InspiredLebowski
So obviously Cleveland is saying all or nothing, 2010 is the title year. Who's left out there for the MLE?
Looks like they already spent most of it on Anthony Parker (rumored ~$3M), instead of Matt Barnes like a smart GM would have.
-
PhilLEEs 2011
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Verejao got Billy King'd.
-
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
How stupi is Danny Ferry? It's official. LeBron to NY. How can he put up with a GM that does this? One of the worst GMs ever. The only reason he's had team success is cause God gave him the gift of King James.
-
NBA rookie of the year
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Other than Shaq move the Cavs offseason between draft and FA period has left a lot to be desire to say the least.
-
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Originally Posted by boozehound
but they couldnt get sheed. and they couldnt get dice. so they panicked
This happens too often though. Danny Ferry is a complete and utter moron. This is worse than the signing of Hughes when they couldn't lure Redd.
-
Local High School Star
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Originally Posted by beasted86
Looks like they already spent most of it on Anthony Parker (rumored ~$3M), instead of Matt Barnes like a smart GM would have.
Matt barnes would not be a good fit here. He thrives in fast pace offenses. Scoop jackson and Chris Broussard both said parker is a better fit and i agree. Parker > Barnes
-
Banned
Re: Varejao re-ups with Cleveland for 6 years $50 million
Originally Posted by HaNdLe ThE RoCk
The Cavs way, way overpaid, especially when you look at what Pachulia got.
He's not worth the money, but the more important thing was not to lose a player and aggravate LBJ, who could then leave.
But in a couple of years, I could see him getting traded, so Cleveland can unload his awful contract.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|