Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 24 of 24
  1. #16
    NBA Legend tontoz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    15,977

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    Bird was an old rookie at 23. If i remember right he hurt his back working at home.

    Amazing player in his prime. His size, skills, IQ and drive would make him a star in any era.

    Longevity is an important issue when judging great players and it should count against him.

  2. #17
    Good college starter
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    3,142

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    Bird helped his team win. He's from the era before Michael Jordan and the consequent media fixation on individual greatness to boost marketing and sales. Magic gets props for the additional rings but his weaker opposition in the West at the time gets overlooked and he benefits from having a career that lasted a little longer into the 90s and still being in the news in the present.
    Last edited by Stephonit; 03-10-2019 at 10:05 AM.

  3. #18
    Seething... ClipperRevival's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    7,971

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    Absolutely.

    His body just failed him.

  4. #19
    NBA Legend FKAri's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    16,611

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronbron23
    Anybody who thinks that bird wouldn't dominate in a weak defensive era that revolves around threes is an idiot. I think he gets down graded for his lack of athleticism and flash. His dominance revolved around intelligence, heart and fundamentals. Tim Duncan has been downgraded for the same reason I believe.
    Duncan, downgraded? He's barely out of the league

  5. #20
    Very good NBA starter Round Mound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    8,387

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    Quote Originally Posted by 72-10
    He put in more basketball practice than most, but he apparently did not condition himself quite as much? Fair call?
    He did condition himself but he was not athletic enough to last that long because he also played the game too hard. He would dive for loose balls, hustle, tough rebounder and tough team defender. That's what made him amazing but he wasn't going to last that long because his lack of athletecism.

  6. #21
    Bran Fam Member ImKobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Staples Center
    Posts
    26,596

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    Bird and Magic both had very short careers when you think about it. Magic actually retired a year earlier due to HIV but did come back for 30 something games in 95. Those guys should have won more than they did, Magic was only 31 and had 9 Finals under his belt with 5 rings. Bird's issue is that he came into the league at 23, his longevity numbers would look a lot better if he came in at 20 like Magic. Magic should be #1 all-time in assists and Bird should be at least top 10 in scoring.

  7. #22
    Coach SamuraiSWISH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    13,486

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    Quote Originally Posted by kuniva_dAMiGhTy
    Yup.

    Its why Magic is regarded as the "greater player". Well that and 5 championships.

    People who watched Bird or at least know about his career talk about the healthy version. The guy better than every perimeter player not named Michael Jordan.
    This ... and he was better than Magic.

  8. #23
    NBA All-star
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    9,723

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    this is pretty much discussing the impact of George Bush Sr.

  9. #24
    Bron/Brady not top 10 Mr.GOAT2408's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    Location
    Bronsexuals nightmare
    Posts
    768

    Default Re: Does Bird get downgraded for a Perceived lack of Longevity

    His averages still look good but even that's because he started his career at age 23. If you compare his career averages to other all-timers from 23-35 he doesn't really stand out as much. So the lack of longevity kinda evens out. Still had a great 5 year stretch that stacks up with just about anyone. Still in the top 10 discussion

    His style of play pretty much invited injuries too even if his biggest injuries occurred outside the court

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •