Blake Griffin for Anthony Davis straight up who says no

[lil jahlil]

Davis = younger, better, and less likely to punch staff

Obviously Pelicans give him up for Griffin

[$LakerGold]

Blake's 27 years old.

[Town's Town]

Blake's 27 years old.

Anthony Davis is 22.

[Finger Roll]

op definitely didnt say no to drugs

[$LakerGold]

Anthony Davis is 22.

The point is, he's struggling in expanding/improving his game & he's hitting 30 in 3 years -- that also means?

[PP34Deuce]

Chris Paul will gladly take Anthony Davis.

Anthony Davis can score 20PPG off just moving without the ball. The Clippers with Davis get tougher and longer.

[senelcoolidge]

No. You can run an offense through Blake. You don't need a star caliber PG around Blake, just one that knows where to pass the ball. Blake finds open shooters. Blake just does more. Davis is a great talent but he needs someone to put the ball in spots for him. Davis is also not as great a defender as some people make him out to be.

[Optimus Prime]

Pelicans say no without hesitation.

Davis could be the next big thing. All Griffin can do is dunk. And whine. And flop.

[Nastradamus]

Clipps would need to give up Redick and Griffin for Davis and Gordon. That's atleast close to fair but I still wouldn't do it unless Davis was asking for a trade.

No, its not. Stop