-
Very good NBA starter
Last edited by Round Mound; 08-31-2012 at 06:24 PM.
-
3-time NBA All-Star
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
we're not comparing peaks.. but careers
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by kurple
we're not comparing peaks.. but careers
Those Stats Have Nothing to Do With Peaks but Actually Whole Careers In Terms of Mid Range and Post Range Scoring.
-
3-time NBA All-Star
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
cool. but basketball isnt all about mid-range and post scoring stats
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by kurple
cool. but basketball isnt all about mid-range and post scoring stats
True..There is Alot More Things...In Which Barkley Was Better than Malone at Most and Impacting the Game:
-Scoring With High Efficiency
-Recieving More Double Teams and Defensive Rotations
-Being Called the Zone Buster
-Needing Rule Change (5 Second Back to the Basket Rule-Anti Barkley)
-Game Creating and Passing
-Rebounding
-Floor D and Help D: Barkley the Superior Stealer and Shot Blocker.
-Having Big Games in the Play-Offs.
-Being Clutcher
etc
Only Things Malone has Over Barkley was FT Shooting and Man to Man Defense (But he was No Garnett or Duncan)
Barkley Was Better at More Things Than Malone Was Better Than Barkley At.
-
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Karl Malone NEEDED John Stockton. I forget the number but the assisted basket percentage of Malone's shots was remarkably high. Not to mention his epic level of choking.....
for me it comes down to Barkley, Hondo and Baylor.
I'll vote for Baylor.
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by Round Mound
True..There is Alot More Things...In Which Barkley Was Better than Malone at Most and Impacting the Game:
-Scoring With High Efficiency
-Recieving More Double Teams and Defensive Rotations
-Being Called the Zone Buster
-Needing Rule Change (5 Second Back to the Basket Rule-Anti Barkley)
-Game Creating and Passing
-Rebounding
-Floor D and Help D: Barkley the Superior Stealer and Shot Blocker.
-Having Big Games in the Play-Offs.
-Being Clutcher
etc
Only Things Malone has Over Barkley was FT Shooting and Man to Man Defense (But he was No Garnett or Duncan)
Barkley Was Better at More Things Than Malone Was Better Than Barkley At.
I don't agree with Barkley being top 10, but respect your research/knowledge of this stuff.
-
Very good NBA starter
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
I don't agree with Barkley being top 10, but respect your research/knowledge of this stuff.
Stat Wise Barkley is a Top 10 All Time. And I Don`t Mean Raw Stats but Broken Down Stats or Analysis Stats...Which Acredit For Not What He Wan`t or Like But What Really Happened. Remember, Not What We Like
See Barkley Was Top 10 All Time in
EFF
PER
+/-
WS Per 48 Minutes
Shot Made/Missed Diferential etc
Infact Only Michael Jordan and Barkley are All Top 10 In All Those Broken Down Stats. That Says Alot About Barkley`s Level When Healthy and Prime
Last edited by Round Mound; 08-31-2012 at 05:22 PM.
-
Curry: 0x Finals MVP
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by Round Mound
Stat Wise Barkley is a Top 10 All Time. And I Don`t Mean Raw Stats but Broken Down Stats or Analysis Stats...Which Acredit For Not What He Wan`t or Like But What Really Happened. Remember, Not What We Like
See Barkley Was Top 10 All Time in
EFF
PER
+/-
WS Per 48 Minutes
Shot Made/Missed Diferential etc
Infact Only Michael Jordan and Barkley are All Top 10 In All Those Broken Down Stats. That Says Alot About Barkley`s Level When Healthy and Prime
That definitely helps his case more. For the record, I don't hold it against for not having a ring. I just thought his prime was short than a lot of the guys on the top 10.
-
08-31-2012, 05:58 PM
#100
Very good NBA starter
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Originally Posted by SilkkTheShocker
That definitely helps his case more. For the record, I don't hold it against for not having a ring. I just thought his prime was short than a lot of the guys on the top 10.
[B]Well Stats Don
-
08-31-2012, 06:10 PM
#101
L
Re: #17 NBA Player Of All-Time According to InsideHoops
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|