Originally Posted by Whoah10115
I like Parker and always have. It's not about stats, but Paul is a better player. Parker has become an elite one tho. Like better than Billups when Billups was at his best. But Paul is a guy who could be the best player in the conference when he plays up to his own standards. It's not about stat-padding. His decision-making and control are the reasons.
In your mind, what could Parker do (as a Spur) to prove he is as good as / better than Paul?