#1 Player RIGHT NOW (According To ISH

[QUOTE=BULLS]No, he was actually the best player on his team.

Shaq was the most dominant. As in all cases, the big man will always be considered as the #1 option.

Shaq would have done nothing without Kobe.[/QUOTE]
:roll: Vice versa stupid.








[QUOTE]Kobe's team, as bad as it is, has proven to do nothing but fail, game after game.

Put Duncan on the Lakers and see if they even make the playoffs.[/QUOTE]
Spurs isn't great of a team, honestly. The way they were meshed -- it was all anchored around Duncan. You actually think if Kobe was there, they'd win those 4 rings? No. He'd basically ruin their chemistry.



[QUOTE]I'm sure you're the type of scrub who everyone considers a 5th option, but you touch the ball about one time a game, and celebrate when your team wins, although you had no impact on the game whatsoever.

Kobe can do whatever he wants because he's that good. Duncan is not. He needs a great team, like everyone.[/QUOTE]
How do you get so deeply detailed? Probably because that's your sitatuation when you play basketball.

:roll:

[QUOTE=Thorpesaurous]There's a whole other end of the court that Duncan dominates in a manner that wins. Kobe's offensive arsenal, as good as it is, has proven to do nothing for anyone but himself. Guys who [B]change the game[/B] don't fail to win a playoff series during three straight years of their prime.
[/QUOTE]

Why to you people measure how good a player is by his team?


You put duncan on the lakers without kobe he doesn't get out of the first round either... The suns would p0wn his ass.

[QUOTE=jo3y91]just wondering did u watch the start of the season last year?? kobe was changing the game helping his players he was in serious contention for the MVP. it wasn't until injuries that that fkd up the teams chances n chemistry.[/QUOTE]
helping his players? nah. saw that in the Shaq days though. :roll:

These guys minds are so .. freaking childish. They remain to be hooked on stats, individual talent and dont take things like team success into consideration. Guys like Cannonball and BULLS must have just graduated from junior high.

Stats? LMFAO;

:roll: :roll:

[QUOTE]No, he was actually the best player on his team.

Shaq was the most dominant. As in all cases, the big man will always be considered as the #1 option.

Shaq would have done nothing without Kobe. [/QUOTE]

Mega omg no. Shaq was killing people out there. You are an idiot if you think kobe was better than Shaq... Wow just wow.








[QUOTE]Kobe's team, as bad as it is, has proven to do nothing but fail, game after game.

Put Duncan on the Lakers and see if they even make the playoffs.[/QUOTE]
They make the P/o's then lose to the suns.

[QUOTE=BULLS]Shaq "one" with Wade.

Shaq would have won nothing without Wade

Shaq would have won nothing without Kobe.[/QUOTE]
so.. Kobe still is top 3. Not top 1.

[QUOTE=Odenorbust]Kobe was the 2nd best player on that team. Without Kobe Shaq one another team. Without Shaq
kobe can't do anything[/QUOTE]

and without kobe shaq wouldnt have won.:)

i vote kobe.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RL9lORmoBFs[/url]

not a rick and roll

kobe is the best single player right now.

duncan is the most dominant team player right now.

[QUOTE=BULLS]So you think Kobe was the most dominant on that team? Fool. :oldlol: [/QUOTE]
he was the sidekick dumbass. shaq was the most dominant and was the best player.

dumbass alert. go back to school.











[QUOTE]:oldlol:

Learn basketball. Chemistry has little to do with it. Kobe freaking Bryant will ruin chemistry, LOL. That's your argument? You are pathetic.

If Kobe was there, they wouldn't have been eliminated by Dallas in 06, and would have won 5 titles at least.[/QUOTE]
Chemistry has everything to do with it. telling people to learn basketball should be the last thing you should be telling to people. you should. Kobe bryant would look like an idiot playing for the sputs. hogging every possession.

:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: 5 titles? :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

[QUOTE=DAXX]guy bases a player on individual talent.[/QUOTE]

But isn't that what this is about?

There is no doubt in my mind that TD is the greatest PF ever. But [b]right now[/b] Kobe is the superior individual talent.

Kobe>Duncan
Duncan>everyone else

FOOL. who says that nowadays? oh yeah. guys like 8 -9 years old. nothing else to say thats why. thats what they do to back things up. it'll clog up on what they'll say

Fool!

Fool!

:roll:

[QUOTE=DAXX]These guys minds are so .. freaking childish. They remain to be hooked on stats, individual talent and dont take things like team success into consideration. Guys like Cannonball and BULLS must have just graduated from junior high.

Stats? LMFAO;

:roll: :roll:[/QUOTE]
I'm not hooked on stats. I don't even know what kobe's are.... Idiot. You can easily tell. If you need to score who in this league do you give the ball to? Kobe.. Who will contain the opposing teams best wing player? Kobe.

If LeBron develops the clutch play of kobe and a jumper he will be the best.

Duncan.

[QUOTE]That makes him the most dominant player on his team, fool. [/QUOTE]

Yes exactly. No one could stop him and arguing about who is better shaq or kobe when they were on the lakers is retarded. It's so obvious....