Would Pop or Spo Take Their All-Star Starting Line Up Over Their Own Teams' Starters?
 

I mean is the headache of having 5 all-star starters on your team worth the production you might get out of them?

Re: Would Pop or Spo Take Their All-Star Starting Line Up Over Their Own Teams' Starters?
 

It's not just the headache, it's just that role players are underrated. You need them to win, and stars are incapable of doing their jobs.

Re: Would Pop or Spo Take Their All-Star Starting Line Up Over Their Own Teams' Starters?
 

Fixed

Not all stars are primadonas and have sacrificed their individual play for better team play without question. Duncan and Robinson are two prime examples of HOF level players that put the team first. Ginobli is another, not complaining a single time about coming off the bench even though he was an all-star.

Re: Would Pop or Spo Take Their All-Star Starting Line Up Over Their Own Teams' Starters?
 

Spoelstra would without question.

Re: Would Pop or Spo Take Their All-Star Starting Line Up Over Their Own Teams' Starters?
 

I agree with the role players' underrated impact, good luck asking an all-star to take Leonard's role on the Spurs and like it, same goes for Mario Chalmers on the Heat as another instance.