[QUOTE=RaininTwos]Milwaukee?
That's stupid as hell.[/QUOTE]
Stupid? It's the least valuable franchise in the NBA, with little to no prospects of ever making money.
[url]http://www.forbes.com/nba-valuations/#p_3_s_a0_[/url]
Printable View
[QUOTE=RaininTwos]Milwaukee?
That's stupid as hell.[/QUOTE]
Stupid? It's the least valuable franchise in the NBA, with little to no prospects of ever making money.
[url]http://www.forbes.com/nba-valuations/#p_3_s_a0_[/url]
[QUOTE=RaininTwos]Milwaukee?
That's stupid as hell.[/QUOTE]
To be honest, the Bucks are the team I ALWAYS forget when looking up teams. No one ever talks about them it seems.
[QUOTE=Sarcastic]Stupid? It's the least valuable franchise in the NBA, with little to no prospects of ever making money.
[url]http://www.forbes.com/nba-valuations/#p_3_s_a0_[/url][/QUOTE]
That's how people judge franchises now?
[QUOTE=SpecialQue]To be honest, the Bucks are the team I ALWAYS forget when looking up teams. No one ever talks about them it seems.[/QUOTE]
They are low-key, but that doesn't make them horrible or anywhere near the worst. They have had good teams in almost every decade. People here need to chill.
How are you not banned OP :biggums: ?
[QUOTE=RaininTwos]That's how people judge franchises now?
They are low-key, but that doesn't make them horrible or anywhere near the worst. They have had good teams in almost every decade. People here need to chill.[/QUOTE]
They are far from a bad team. I actually expected them to grab the 8 seed last season. They're just REALLY low key, as you said.
[QUOTE=RaininTwos]That's how people judge franchises now?
They are low-key, but that doesn't make them horrible or anywhere near the worst. They have had good teams in almost every decade. People here need to chill.[/QUOTE]
They had a 7 year run in the 1990s of missing the playoffs.
Knicks get called dogshit when they missed for 6 years, and 2 of those they were in complete tank mode just dumping salary.
And yes, team valuation is how you judge franchises. If you were to name the worst franchises in the NFL, the list would probably include the Bills and Jaguars, who are among the least valuable teams.
[QUOTE=Sarcastic]They had a 7 year run in the 1990s of missing the playoffs.
Knicks get called dogshit when they missed for 6 years, and 2 of those they were in complete tank mode just dumping salary.
[B]And yes, team valuation is how you judge franchises. If you were to name the worst franchises in the NFL, the list would probably include the Bills and Jaguars, who are among the least valuable teams.[/B][/QUOTE]
That's stupid.
You are only doing this Team Value thing to prop the Knicks up. Stop it b.
Knicks got called dogshit because they sucked. How's that relevant?
[QUOTE=RaininTwos]That's stupid.
You are only doing this Team Value thing to prop the Knicks up. Stop it b.
Knicks got called dogshit because they sucked. How's that relevant?[/QUOTE]
The Bulls sucked for 6 years after Jordan and didn't make the playoffs. Would you ever say they were a bad franchise?
Winning, or making the playoffs doesn't mean you are a good franchise. The Cubs haven't won a World Series in over 100 years. Would you call them one of the worst franchises? The Red Sox had a 86 year drought. Were they ever a bad franchise?
[QUOTE=Sarcastic]The Bulls sucked for 6 years after Jordan and didn't make the playoffs. Would you ever say they were a bad franchise?
Winning, or making the playoffs doesn't mean you are a good franchise. The Cubs haven't won a World Series in over 100 years. Would you call them one of the worst franchises? The Red Sox had a 86 year drought. Were they ever a bad franchise?[/QUOTE]
What in the world are you talking about?
The reason why the Cubs and Red Sox weren't considered one of the worst franchises was because they had great players during those amazingly long droughts.
You keep adding more idiocy to your argument.
The Knicks are a middle to back of the pack franchise, let it go.
This thread is about the second worst franchise ever and Milwaukee is an absurd choice. Stop posting.
[QUOTE=RaininTwos]What in the world are you talking about?
The reason why the Cubs and Red Sox weren't considered one of the worst franchises was because they had great players during those amazingly long droughts.
You keep adding more idiocy to your argument.
The Knicks are a middle to back of the pack franchise, let it go.
This thread is about the second worst franchise ever and Milwaukee is an absurd choice. Stop posting.[/QUOTE]
Knicks are middle to back of the pack? Well since winning means so much to you, there are 6 teams with more titles than the Knicks, and Milwaukee is not one of them.
I'd love to see who you think is the second worst franchise.
I'm not sure how anybody can defend the post-JVG Knicks. They've been straight up garbage. Trash. Only team that's been worse than them during this last 11 years are the Bobcats and they're only an 8 years old franchise.
Clippers at least have their 2006 and 2012 highlights.
Knicks may not be the worst franchise in history but they're in discussion for the worst list of franchises since the ABA-NBA merger(1976).
[QUOTE=AK47DR91]I'm not sure how anybody can defend the post-JVG Knicks. They've been straight up garbage. Trash. Only team that's been worse than them during this last 11 years are the Bobcats and they're only an 8 years old franchise.
Clippers at least have their 2006 and 2012 highlights.
Knicks may not be the worst franchise in history but they're in discussion for the worst list of franchises since the ABA-NBA merger(1976).[/QUOTE]
I present to you the history of the GS Warriors
[url]http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/GSW/[/url]
They missed the playoffs 29 times in the last 36 years, since the ABA merger. Going by your standards, they must be the worst franchise. Amirite?
[QUOTE=Sarcastic]Knicks are middle to back of the pack? Well since winning means so much to you, there are 6 teams with more titles than the Knicks, and Milwaukee is not one of them.
I'd love to see who you think is the second worst franchise.[/QUOTE]
Do you realize that Milwaukee has a way better winning percentage than the Knicks?
[QUOTE=Sarcastic]I present to you the history of the GS Warriors
[url]http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/GSW/[/url]
They missed the playoffs 29 times in the last 36 years, since the ABA merger. Going by your standards, they must be the worst franchise. Amirite?[/QUOTE]
Nah man, Milwaukee is way worse than them.
We're going by winning percentage now? :lol
Way to move the goal posts.
Ok so the worst teams are:
Bobcats - .358 winning %
Grizzlies - .365 winning %
Clippers - .367 winning %
The Suns, Jazz, Blazer, Bucks ARE ALL AHEAD of the Chicago Bulls.