Thoughts?
I thought it was a disgraceful decision by the NBA and Stern. It screwed over the Lakers in a big way. We could be talking about a Laker dynasty and not the current Heat one.
Printable View
Thoughts?
I thought it was a disgraceful decision by the NBA and Stern. It screwed over the Lakers in a big way. We could be talking about a Laker dynasty and not the current Heat one.
You're bringing back bad memories
Both Rockets and Pelicans are in a good place now : Stern helped the Pelicans get Davis ; Rockets got Harden and Dwight instead of Pau and Nene
[QUOTE=poido123]Thoughts?
I thought it was a disgraceful decision by the NBA and Stern. It screwed over the Lakers in a big way. We could be talking about a Laker dynasty and not the current Heat one.[/QUOTE]
Yes, because all we need is another Lakers dynasty.
I guess the Lakers having Howard, Gasol, World Peace, Kobe and Nash just wasn't enough. They needed MORE!
As a neutral, third-party observer I'd have to say the veto was justified.
[QUOTE=Fiasco]As a neutral, third-party observer I'd have to say the veto was justified.[/QUOTE]
:roll:
Hornets were owned by the NBA at the time so i was 100% fine with it.
[QUOTE=Meticode]Yes, because all we need is another Lakers dynasty.
I guess the Lakers having Howard, Gasol, World Peace, Kobe and Nash just wasn't enough. They needed MORE![/QUOTE]
:lol
With our personal bias aside, the Lakers got jobbed on this one.
No two ways about it.
Paul and Kobe weren't a good fit anyway. Poor, poor Lakers! :violin:
Funny how the Gasol trade was perfectly fine and legit.
[QUOTE=poido123]Thoughts?
I thought it was a disgraceful decision by the NBA and Stern. It screwed over the Lakers in a big way. We could be talking about a Laker dynasty and not the current Heat one.[/QUOTE]
Bullshit veto it ruined the Lakers future. And what's funny is that owners were complaining about big market teams and so the Hornets trade Paul to Los Angeles! That's the NBA in a nutshell.
[QUOTE=poido123]:lol
[B]With our personal bias aside,[/B] the Lakers got jobbed on this one.
No two ways about it.[/QUOTE]
That's ironic because I get the sense that you're just upset that the Heat are winning titles and that's why your upset about the veto.
hornets were owned by the NBA and the trade would lower the value of the team when it came time to sell. The veto was fine, there is no conspiracy, it was annoying the acting GM should not have confirmed any deals without talking to the league, get over it.
[QUOTE=moe94]Funny how the Gasol trade was perfectly fine and legit.[/QUOTE]
It was legit.
Which is why the trade went through? :confusedshrug:
[QUOTE=outbreak]hornets were owned by the NBA and the trade would lower the value of the team when it came time to sell. The veto was fine, there is no conspiracy, it was annoying the acting GM should not have confirmed any deals without talking to the league, get over it.[/QUOTE]
I'm not a Lakers fan. But I do sympathise with them on this one.
[QUOTE=Meticode]Yes, because all we need is another Lakers dynasty.
I guess the Lakers having Howard, Gasol, World Peace, Kobe and Nash just wasn't enough. They needed MORE![/QUOTE]
If the trade had gone through they wouldn't have had Howard Gasol or Nash
Anyways it is what it is, Lakers have moved on and have other fish to fry.