[URL="http://mikesmind.sportsblog.com/posts/31936711/second-crack-at-a-2017-mock.html"]Mock 2.0[/URL]
Wrote this in like 40 minutes, dead tired. Kill me on it :cheers:
Printable View
[URL="http://mikesmind.sportsblog.com/posts/31936711/second-crack-at-a-2017-mock.html"]Mock 2.0[/URL]
Wrote this in like 40 minutes, dead tired. Kill me on it :cheers:
[QUOTE=qrich][URL="http://mikesmind.sportsblog.com/posts/31936711/second-crack-at-a-2017-mock.html"]Mock 2.0[/URL]
Wrote this in like 40 minutes, dead tired. Kill me on it :cheers:[/QUOTE]
This [I]your[/I] blog?
[QUOTE=qrich][URL="http://mikesmind.sportsblog.com/posts/31936711/second-crack-at-a-2017-mock.html"]Mock 2.0[/URL]
Wrote this in like 40 minutes, dead tired. Kill me on it :cheers:[/QUOTE]
No way Monk and Fox drop that low
[QUOTE=FreezingTsmoove]No way Monk and Fox drop that low[/QUOTE]
Probably not Monk but I can see Fox dropping.
[QUOTE=UK2K]This [I]your[/I] blog?[/QUOTE]
Si.
[QUOTE=qrich]
Si.[/QUOTE]
Add some color. At least put the team logos next to their draft pick or something.
Too much bold, black lettering to read for every pick.
From a UK fan's perspective:
On a related note: No ****ing way does Bam get taken that high. He's been very underwhelming. He may not even be a first round pick. I wouldn't take him in the first round. He'll get drafted on potential but outside of a handful of games, he's been a nobody.
On a related related note: Monk is going to be drafted high, but I think he'll be a disappointment. Kevin Martin 2.0. Dude went [B][I][U]77[/U][/I][/B] game minutes without getting a rebound.
I also think Fox is a top 10 pick. He may not be picked there, but he will end up with the value there when its all said and done.
[QUOTE=UK2K]Add some color. At least put the team logos next to their draft pick or something.
Too much bold, black lettering to read for every pick. [/quote]
Would if I could, but the platform is absolute shite. I used to be able to just copy & paste HTML coding and it would come out perfectly, but since an ownership change occurred, that's all they allow :facepalm
Been looking for a new place to write this shit at, but might just go through WordPress and do it myself soon, then I can figure out how to make $10 a month with ads! Yay!
[QUOTE=FreezingTsmoove]No way Monk and Fox drop that low[/QUOTE]
Who would monk be drafted over here?
I honestly don't know much about Ntilikina but the other 8 guys ahead of him in this mock are better players. Most of them rather easily at that.
Fultz and Ball is tough one for me.
Fultz has higher upside but ball has a higher floor.
I'd probably take Fultz
Just saw the Luke Kennard/Chris Mullin comparison.
Holy shit how on point is that?
[QUOTE=ShawkFactory]Who would monk be drafted over here?
I honestly don't know much about Ntilikina but the other 8 guys ahead of him in this mock are better players. Most of them rather easily at that.
Fultz and Ball is tough one for me.
Fultz has higher upside but ball has a higher floor.
I'd probably take Fultz[/QUOTE]
Honestly, and this pains me to say this, but I am not a Monk fan.
May be a great baller at the next level, but he's definitely not a fan favorite at UK right now.
[URL="https://mikeksmind.wordpress.com/2017/03/21/sweet-16-mock-draft-3-0/"]Sweet 16 Mock[/URL]
Using Wordpress so I got different colors and pictures just for you UK :applause:
[QUOTE=qrich][URL="https://mikeksmind.wordpress.com/2017/03/21/sweet-16-mock-draft-3-0/"]Sweet 16 Mock[/URL]
Using Wordpress so I got different colors and pictures just for you UK :applause:[/QUOTE]
Ha I like it! Helps break up the giant block of text.
Like the Fox pick... I think Sacramento takes him with their first pick unless they know they can get him with their second pick. He'll be a perfect fit next to Hield, WCS, and Skal.
I have to think Fultz will be the #1 pick. There's not a whole lot that he can't do. In fact, you'd be hard pressed to find anything negative about his game, or his physicals.
Nice job. :applause:
[QUOTE=UK2K]Ha I like it! Helps break up the giant block of text.
Like the Fox pick... I think Sacramento takes him with their first pick unless they know they can get him with their second pick. He'll be a perfect fit next to Hield, WCS, and Skal.
I have to think Fultz will be the #1 pick. There's not a whole lot that he can't do. In fact, you'd be hard pressed to find anything negative about his game, or his physicals.
Nice job. :applause:[/QUOTE]
Combine aside, I just think executives being able to see Lonzo more and Fultz less hurts his shots at being the top pick (at the moment, at least). Maybe it's just homerism though :D.
I was initially going to have the Kings take Lauri at 6 and Fox at 9, but don't see the Knicks passing up on Fox, so went with it that way.
And yes, just going to keep being a Morris-stan. Dude is the best point guard in the NCAA the past four years ;D
[QUOTE=qrich]Combine aside, I just think executives being able to see Lonzo more and Fultz less hurts his shots at being the top pick (at the moment, at least). Maybe it's just homerism though :D.
I was initially going to have the Kings take Lauri at 6 and Fox at 9, but don't see the Knicks passing up on Fox, so went with it that way.
And yes, just going to keep being a Morris-stan. Dude is the best point guard in the NCAA the past four years ;D[/QUOTE]
Morris is nice as a college player, but don't know how that will transition to the NBA. I thought the same thing about Cam Payne, and we see how he turned out. I wanted to Rockets to take him back in the day.