2010 Kobe is number 1. Parker in 07 and Billups in 04 also come to mind. Who else?
Total list so far:
Kobe
Pierce
Billups
Parker
Printable View
2010 Kobe is number 1. Parker in 07 and Billups in 04 also come to mind. Who else?
Total list so far:
Kobe
Pierce
Billups
Parker
Probably Kobe's. Not that that means he's a bad player.
Oh boy , is the main ISH board now a Kobe board?
Wow that seems a little narrow-minded. I always considered Paul Pierce's trophy very shaky.
Kobe's easily. Gasol got robbed.
6/24 in Game 7.
[QUOTE=Pursuer]Wow that seems a little narrow-minded. I always considered Paul Pierce's trophy very shaky.[/QUOTE]
i still remember the look of disappointment on Ray-Ray's face
[QUOTE=DonDadda59][B][SIZE="5"]6/24 in Game 7[/SIZE][/B].[/QUOTE]
Da Man has spoken. Respect for ma brothaa.
billups
If you consider the '80s as the start of the modern era, then it's easily Cedric Maxwell and Chauncey Billups.
:oldlol: @ Kobe in '10. Even most people were saying that even if the Lakers had lost that series that Kobe could get the Finals MVP award ala Jerry West when he lost in the Finals, but still won MVP in '69.
Kobe limited Rondo big time. Everyone was proclaiming him the best PG in the game before that series. Other than one game, he never went off. The one game he did, Kobe was in foul trouble.
I don't think most people realize how tough it is for a guard to get 15 rebounds. Kobe came up huge in game 7. Who kept the team in perspective the whole series? Kobe and Fisher. If you pay attention to those press conferences, Kobe was sending a message to the team. Gasol mentioned this.
Kobe disrupted the most important player on the other team (Rondo). Rondo is the engine that made the Celtics run. Kobe turned him into the Little Engine that Couldn't.
The bottom line is that nobody shot well for their positions. Kobe's FG% in game 7 is the only reason this is a discussion. Regardless his overall stats are by far the best. And I said before it's based purely on numbers without the biases and agendas found on ISH. I know Kobe detractors really wanted Gasol to win it, but his numbers although good for him, aren't Kobe's.
29 PTS 8.0 REBS 5 AST 2.14 STL
[QUOTE=DonDadda59]6/24 in Game 7.[/QUOTE]
Agreed.
[QUOTE=Pursuer]Wow that seems a little narrow-minded. I always considered Paul Pierce's trophy very shaky.[/QUOTE]
Pierce is a good one forgot about him.
[QUOTE=Pursuer]Wow that seems a little narrow-minded. I always considered [B][U]Paul Pierce's trophy very shaky[/U][/B].[/QUOTE]
^This^
I believe that was one of those, "highest scoring avg. = MVP" quick decisions. It's not that Pierce was a bad choice. It was just that it was by no means clear cut and very debatable.
[QUOTE=Ne 1]If you consider the '80s as the start of the modern era, then it's easily Cedric Maxwell and Chauncey Billups.
:oldlol: @ Kobe in '10. Even most people were saying that even if the Lakers had lost that series that Kobe could get the Finals MVP award ala Jerry West when he lost in the Finals, but still won MVP in '69.
Kobe limited Rondo big time. Everyone was proclaiming him the best PG in the game before that series. Other than one game, he never went off. The one game he did, Kobe was in foul trouble.
I don't think most people realize how tough it is for a guard to get 15 rebounds. Kobe came up huge in game 7. Who kept the team in perspective the whole series? Kobe and Fisher. If you pay attention to those press conferences, Kobe was sending a message to the team. Gasol mentioned this.
Kobe disrupted the most important player on the other team (Rondo). Rondo is the engine that made the Celtics run. Kobe turned him into the Little Engine that Couldn't.
The bottom line is that nobody shot well for their positions. Kobe's FG% in game 7 is the only reason this is a discussion. Regardless his overall stats are by far the best. And I said before it's based purely on numbers without the biases and agendas found on ISH. I know Kobe detractors really wanted Gasol to win it, but his numbers although good for him, aren't Kobe's.
29 PTS 8.0 REBS 5 AST 2.14 STL[/QUOTE]
Didn't read.
[QUOTE=jlip]^This^
I believe that was one of those, "highest scoring avg. = MVP" quick decisions. It's not that Pierce was a bad choice. It was just that it was by no means clear cut and very debatable.[/QUOTE]
its clear who deserved that mvp, kg, but we all know why pierce got it
[QUOTE=DonDadda59]6/24 in Game 7.[/QUOTE]
5-19 in Game 6
10-27 Game 7
[QUOTE=jlip]^This^
I believe that was one of those, "highest scoring avg. = MVP" quick decisions. It's not that Pierce was a bad choice. It was just that it was by no means clear cut and very debatable.[/QUOTE]
KG deserved it, but they gave it to Pierce as a 'you stayed on this team forever' thing.
Kobe's in 2010 was terrible though.
[QUOTE=PJR]Didn't read.[/QUOTE]
because you most likely cant read
[QUOTE=PJR]Didn't read.[/QUOTE]
No surprise here illiterate people can't read
I'm just glad you had enough time on your hands so that you could quote it & make a post telling us you didn't read it..
07 parker
04 billups
05 duncan
08 pierce
12 lebron
96 jordan
[QUOTE=TheMarkMadsen]No surprise here illiterate people can't read
I'm just glad you had enough time on your hands so that you could quote it & make a post telling us you didn't read it..[/QUOTE]
:lol
Garnett deserved FMVP.
That's not to say his performance was worse than Parkers or Billups' but those were two great complete teams so you can understand their awards.
Kobe 2010 didn't deserve it. Gasol shoulda gotten it. Though, Gasol wasn't super amazing either so it wasn't too bad that he didn't get it.
Pierce 2008 didn't really deserve it either. Allen and KG played just as good, if not better.
[QUOTE=Rysio]
96 jordan[/QUOTE]
This one is accurate.
During the Finals Jordan not only shot terribly from the field, he was absolute shit in the fourth quarters too (shot 33.3% in them, and only 15.4% in the fourth quarters of the three close games). In the two close wins of the series, Rodman averaged 11 offensive rebounds/game. He was setting records, and when MJ was shooting the team out of the game with bricks (rest of the team struggled shooting wise too though), it was Rodman getting all those rebounds to give Bulls the extra possessions. The Bulls as a team shot much lower than Sonics in that series...why do you think they still won? They got 34 more possessions from offensive rebounds (Rodman alone had 41!). MJ's scoring could have been replaced in that series, but Rodman's historic offensive rebounding? Not so much.
Rodman should have been the MVP of that Finals. The Bulls shot much worse from the field than the Sonics in the Finals but still won. How did that happen? Simple. The Bulls got more shot opportunities from offensive rebounds basically negating many of their misses. Rodman, by himself, secured and additional 41 possessions for the Bulls with his offensive rebounding including 2 games where he tied an NBA Finals record. That's like playing H-O-R-S-E and someone giving you multiple "do overs" after you've missed.
In the deciding Game 6 Jordan went 5-19 (26 FG%) while Rodman set a Finals record with 11 offensive rebounds. At the very least he was the MVP of the close out Game 6.
I agree Gasol had a case for Finals MVP in 2010, but Kobe's 29.5/8.0/5.4 average while shutting down Rondo is pretty damn impressive. People will always bring up 6/24 in Game 7 but nobody shot well in that tough defensive game.
[QUOTE=jlip]^This^
I believe that was one of those, "highest scoring avg. = MVP" quick decisions. It's not that Pierce was a bad choice. It was just that it was by no means clear cut and very debatable.[/QUOTE]
I feel like they gave it to Pierce out of respect. Since he is the captain of the team and was in shitty Celtic teams.
[QUOTE=Ne 1]This one is accurate.
During the Finals Jordan not only shot terribly from the field, he was absolute shit in the fourth quarters too (shot 33.3% in them, and only 15.4% in the fourth quarters of the three close games). In the two close wins of the series, Rodman averaged 11 offensive rebounds/game. He was setting records, and when MJ was shooting the team out of the game with bricks (rest of the team struggled shooting wise too though), it was Rodman getting all those rebounds to give Bulls the extra possessions. The Bulls as a team shot much lower than Sonics in that series...why do you think they still won? They got 34 more possessions from offensive rebounds (Rodman alone had 41!). MJ's scoring could have been replaced in that series, but Rodman's historic offensive rebounding? Not so much.
Rodman should have been the MVP of that Finals. The Bulls shot much worse from the field than the Sonics in the Finals but still won. How did that happen? Simple. The Bulls got more shot opportunities from offensive rebounds basically negating many of their misses. Rodman, by himself, secured and additional 41 possessions for the Bulls with his offensive rebounding including 2 games where he tied an NBA Finals record. That's like playing H-O-R-S-E and someone giving you multiple "do overs" after you've missed.
In the deciding Game 6 Jordan went 5-19 (26 FG%) while Rodman set a Finals record with 11 offensive rebounds. At the very least he was the MVP of the close out Game 6.[/QUOTE]
False.
No one is winning a damn Finals MVP for rebounding alone.
Maybe if Rodman shut Kemp down, he'd have had a shot.
But Kemp put up 23.3 ppg on superb efficiency (55% FG and a TS% of 62.5) and 10.0 rpg.
[QUOTE=cotdt]I agree Gasol had a case for Finals MVP in 2010, but Kobe's 29.5/8.0/5.4 average while shutting down Rondo is pretty damn impressive.[/QUOTE]
I didn't realize that sagging 10 feet off of a guy is 'shutting them down'.
[QUOTE=secund2nun]2010 Kobe is number 1. Parker in 07 and Billups in 04 also come to mind. Who else?
Total list so far:
[B]Kobe[/B]
Pierce
Billups
Parker[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-8RaYTaqPrV0/T6ggRe-TtMI/AAAAAAAACl0/geC50VRiUFM/s1600/kobe+bryant+lakers+gif+omg+wtf+is+going+on.gif[/IMG]
Pierce no question. Didn't he have a 2 point game?
[QUOTE=Droid101]Pierce no question. Didn't he have a 2 point game?[/QUOTE]
No he didn't, he had a 6 point game in 2008.
Ray Allen had a 2 point game in game 3 2010.
KG should have been the FMVP in 2008, but Pierce was easily better than Ray. And his won wasn't that wrong.
As far as worst...I don't get that word. You can rank them and one will be lower than the rest (unless there's a tie) but this thread is really about a. Kobe and b. ripping on other players. It's also about Kobe.
In all honesty, outside of Pierce for KG and Duncan for Manu...it's been pretty accurate going back, until worthy completely robbed Magic Johnson. I mean, that was a crime.
I also think Magic should have Kareem's in 85. An I think Bird should have beaten Maxwell in 81. I was gonna say Willis Reed in 1973, but I remember that being an all-around team. No one was that impressive, to be honest. Boring series too. I think Frazier should have won in 1970...then again, it's tough. Actually, I think Jerry West was the best player on the floor in that series. Dave Cowens should have won...1976 I think it was.
What is the worst agenda thread in modern history: this one.
[QUOTE=ProfessorMurder]No he didn't, he had a 6 point game in 2008.
Ray Allen had a 2 point game in game 3 2010.[/QUOTE]
6 point game, that's the one I was thinking of.
Ray Allen should have had MVP that year, IMO, or KG.
[QUOTE=Droid101]Ray Allen should have had MVP that year, IMO, or KG.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Whoah10115]KG should have been the FMVP in 2008, but Pierce was easily better than Ray. And his won wasn't that wrong. [/QUOTE]
I just looked at the numbers and Ray was much better than I remember. Ray put up numbers, much more efficiently. The only big difference is Pierce's assists and turnovers are much higher.
Big 4 stats, finals only:
Garnett - 18.2 ppg / 13 reb / 3 ast / 1.7 stl / 1 blk / 2.7 to on 42.9 fg% / 76 ft%
Rondo - 9.3 ppg / 3.8 reb / 6.7 ast / 1.5 stl / .5 blk / 1.5 to on 37.7 fg% / 59.3 ft%
Pierce - 21.8 ppg / 4.5 reb / 6.3 ast / 1.2 stl / .3 blk / 3.7 to on 43.2 fg% / 39.3 3pt% / 83 ft%
Ray - 20.3 ppg / 5 reb / 2.5 ast / 1.3 stl / .7 blk / 1.8 to on 50.7 fg% / 52.4 3pt% / 86.7 ft%
I'd still give it to KG... Plus I think KG was the leader of the Celtics in scoring through all the playoffs that year.
I always find it amusing when people point out that Gasol should've been FMVP because Kobe went 6-24 in Game 7, yet completely ignore the fact that Gasol himself shot 6-16 from the field and 7-13 from the line in that game.
Anyway, the answer to the OP is either Pierce in '08 or Billups in '04. Can't go wrong with either.
Lol, for those who are adamant that Pau Gasol should have won that Finals MVP in 2010, am I the only one who remembers how he played when the series moved to Boston for three games?
[QUOTE=Doranku]I always find it amusing when people point out that Gasol should've been FMVP because Kobe went 6-24 in Game 7, yet completely ignore the fact that Gasol himself shot 6-16 from the field and 7-13 from the line in that game.
Anyway, the answer to the OP is either Pierce in '08 or Billups in '04. Can't go wrong with either.[/QUOTE]
Not to mention the six other games that were played.
Paul Pierce or Chauncey Billups
[QUOTE=Ne 1]This one is accurate.
During the Finals Jordan not only shot terribly from the field, he was absolute shit in the fourth quarters too (shot 33.3% in them, and only 15.4% in the fourth quarters of the three close games). In the two close wins of the series, Rodman averaged 11 offensive rebounds/game. He was setting records, and when MJ was shooting the team out of the game with bricks (rest of the team struggled shooting wise too though), it was Rodman getting all those rebounds to give Bulls the extra possessions. The Bulls as a team shot much lower than Sonics in that series...why do you think they still won? They got 34 more possessions from offensive rebounds (Rodman alone had 41!). MJ's scoring could have been replaced in that series, but Rodman's historic offensive rebounding? Not so much.
Rodman should have been the MVP of that Finals. The Bulls shot much worse from the field than the Sonics in the Finals but still won. How did that happen? Simple. The Bulls got more shot opportunities from offensive rebounds basically negating many of their misses. Rodman, by himself, secured and additional 41 possessions for the Bulls with his offensive rebounding including 2 games where he tied an NBA Finals record. That's like playing H-O-R-S-E and someone giving you multiple "do overs" after you've missed.
In the deciding Game 6 Jordan went 5-19 (26 FG%) while Rodman set a Finals record with 11 offensive rebounds. At the very least he was the MVP of the close out Game 6.[/QUOTE]
This is the 3rd time you copied and pasted that same post.
[url]http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=196355[/url]
[url]http://207.58.151.151/forum/showpost.php?p=7171002&postcount=26[/url]
Didn't Jordan shoot 41.4% that series? Which is Kobe's career finals.