[QUOTE=swi7ch]ISH
Where 81 points is better than 100 points. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
It's obviously better:facepalm
But then again, a record is a record
Printable View
[QUOTE=swi7ch]ISH
Where 81 points is better than 100 points. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
It's obviously better:facepalm
But then again, a record is a record
Black Mamba :bowdown:
[QUOTE=I LUV KOBE]:applause:
If GAWDBe play in Wilt era he will score 200 points easily and fouled out every opposing player...[/QUOTE]
Nah, the other team would forfeit after Kobe broke all their ankles :oldlol: :rockon:
[QUOTE=9erempiree]Pretty much finalized because I don't count tweaks any major changes.
The game was basically changed almost in it's entirety in regards to rules and what is illegal today and adopted by the world.[/QUOTE]
Many of the rules changes were because Wilt dominated so much.
[QUOTE=swi7ch]ISH
Where 81 points is better than 100 points. :facepalm[/QUOTE]
Is that like when you clowns claim 1>>5?
strange thread.
100 is the record.
81 is just INSANE
The record is Wilts 100, and it should stay that until someone breaks it.
Now if you want to discuss whether the 81 points was better/harder to do/more important then do that. But don't try to change what the highest scored really was by saying "well, NBA was shit back then so the record is now 81".
ISH, "Kobe, some here have come to the conclusion that your 81 is the record".
Kobe: "what?"
ISH: "Yep, your 81 is the record"
Kobe: "What the fcuk are you talking about man?"
ISH: "81"
Kobe: ":facepalm "
[QUOTE=9erempiree]:facepalm
If you read the thread, you would know why.[/QUOTE]
Yep, it's because you think that Kobe could score more points than Wilt. either that or you are just retarded :lol
Can we really stop making stupid threads like this?
[QUOTE]When Wilt [B]supposedly [/B]scored this many points...[/QUOTE]
Is there anything more that needs to be said about the OP? :oldlol:
So let me get this straight. Just because you don't like the reality that someone once scored 100 points in an NBA game, you choose to ignore it and pretend that 81 is the actual record? How exactly does that work?
Kobetards are really something else:facepalm
[QUOTE=9erempiree]in "modern" basketball. When all rules are finalized. I know most people want to say that Wilt's 100 is a record but not in Modern basketball.[/QUOTE]
This alone will show why you're wrong.
Modern basketball is relative to the modern day. In 50 years, 2007 won't be the modern era.
The rules aren't finalized ever. They are constantly evolving.
If you're not going to count what Wilt did, then you have to accept that eventually what Kobe did won't count either.
[QUOTE=BoutPractice]So let me get this straight. Just because you don't like the reality that someone once scored 100 points in an NBA game, you choose to ignore it and pretend that 81 is the actual record? How exactly does that work?[/QUOTE]
I acknowledge anything above 1978 as modern basketball.
Heck, basketball reference only acknowledges 1985 and up.
They don't even recognize Wilt.
:cheers:
[QUOTE=TheMan]Kobetards are really something else:facepalm[/QUOTE]
Haters are a Joke...not 1 person even saw Chamberlain score 100 points...
nearly everyone here saw Kobe drop 81 and 62..
that's the problem....you have many people here talking about players/Games/rankings ...but they never even watched the players/games :roll:
Wilt has 100 points
[IMG]http://images4.fanpop.com/image/user_images/2963000/AlphaWolf-2963314_1611_930.jpg[/IMG]
is it the record?...sure..
was it better then Kobe?...doubt it.