Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=PHX_Phan]LJJ digging a hole :lol
You're coming off as an idiot. Maybe you don't respect the sport, but using the word marginal to describe the athletes just makes you come off as another idiot flinging turds.
We KNOW the athletes are superior to many sports in certain aspects because that is what the sport demands. You can look at physical numbers from the combine if you need further proof that they are top athletes regardless of where they are in the world.
You also overlook a huge factor in your 'logic.' The money. The NFL makes tons of money. Professional athletes tend to go where there is money. The sport doesn't have to be played all over the world if it's the biggest sport in one of the largest markets.[/QUOTE]
the way he's attempted to validate his retarded statements indicate that he's autistic. poor guy.
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=deja vu]Seriously?
Source: [url]http://www.givemefootball.com/198162-cristiano-ronaldo-challenged-to-100m-race-by-spanish-record-holder[/url][/QUOTE]
Lol...they compared him to Bolt on a soccer site because he made a fast run down the field
If Peterson and Ronaldo raced Peterson would absolutely burn him...the only race Ronaldo might win between the two is long distance and I'm not even sure he could win that, Peterson has good endurance.
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
Been to a rugby game...watched Aussie Rules football...the tackling there vs. the tackling in American football is nowhere near the same.
They're both pretty cool but I don't find either really THAT entertaining. Aussie Rules just looks like a bunch of people playing grabass and kicking it up the field at random times. Takes a lot of endurance though.
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=AngelEyes]There's no talking to retards like you. A toddler can put forth a better argument than your dumb ass.
You make fun of the ability to catch a ball when soccer takes what skill.... ? Kicking a [I]fu[/I]cking ball. My god that is just so much more impressive. At this point you better be trolling, otherwise you may want to get a brain scan, perhaps too many concussions. Well, congratulations for separating yourself from the dumbasses.[/QUOTE]
It was funny when football players came to soccer tryouts. Let's just say that.
Soccer does take more "skill" than football. I would tend to agree with that guy. Football relies much more on athleticism and just being huge more than anything. I like American football...
Also, Johnny ****ing Football is white and an incredible athlete. A better athlete than RGIII.
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=AngelEyes]Seriously? How about... arm strength, accuracy, footwork, field vision, ability to know and execute routes, body control, pass catching, blocking, tackling, punting, kicking, etc.
What a stupid fu[I]c[/I]king question.[/QUOTE]
The only skill in there is throwing the ball and catching. The rest is intelligence and athleticism.
Add in punting and kicking too.
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=PHX_Phan]They probably could be, but that's not how the game is played.
And, do you really think the same thing that happens in scrums doesn't happen in football pile-ups? Not even just in pile-ups, the NFL recently went through a huge ordeal with teams setting up bounties to inflict injury on particular players to take them out of games. Plenty of dirty stuff happens in American football.[/QUOTE]
Rugby Union sure...rugby league not so much.
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=-p.tiddy-]Lol...they compared him to Bolt on a soccer site because he made a fast run down the field
If Peterson and Ronaldo raced Peterson would absolutely burn him...the only race Ronaldo might win between the two is long distance and I'm not even sure he could win that, Peterson has good endurance.[/QUOTE]
LOL c'mon Ronaldo ran 96 meters in less than 10 seconds during the 77th minute of the game. Imagine if he was fresh? :lol Let Peterson run and jog for 77 minutes, let's see if he can still run as fast as Ronaldo. :lol
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=-p.tiddy-]If you don't think the ginormous slave trade did anything to African Americans in terms of physicality then you are in denial...simple as that
most African Americans don't deny this and understand it...watch a Chris Rock stand up
and you're right, no point in arguing it with someone that pretends it didn't happen[/QUOTE]
:wtf:
You do know that the US isnt the only country that had african slaves right?
Brazil had triple the population of African slaves than the US, so we are the most athletic country in the world i guess...
Probably the reason why we are the best soccer team in the world too :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:
Brazil 2014!
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
Now seriously, you can't compare the two sports in athleticism since the players are trained for two very different types of games. In soccer its a lot more important to be agile than strong, see Messi, Neymar, etc. Ball control and skill are supreme, speed and agility too. So the training regime is completely differente from football where the most important parts are explosiveness and strength.
That's why you will never see a good football player become a good soccer player, but you can see the opposite since skill with the soccer ball is very hard to obtain unless you train since you are young but strength can easily be gained in the weight room and with correct nutrition.
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=B-hoop]:wtf:
You do know that the US isnt the only country that had african slaves right?
Brazil had triple the population of African slaves than the US, so we are the most athletic country in the world i guess...
Probably the reason why we are the best soccer team in the world too :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:
Brazil 2014![/QUOTE]
slave breeding was an enormous industry in the US, in fact at one point I believe it was the single biggest money maker in the country...I don't think it was like that for Brazil
However many of the US slaves escaped south to Mexico and South America/Brazil and Jamaica as well as...many of the "black latinos" down there are ancestors of US slaves...many South American MLB players like Sammy Sosa and such have US slave ancestors. I am sure there are plenty of 'black Brazilians" like that as well...I am sure Anderson Silva has slave ancestors
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=B-hoop]:wtf:
You do know that the US isnt the only country that had african slaves right?
Brazil had triple the population of African slaves than the US, so we are the most athletic country in the world i guess...
Probably the reason why we are the best soccer team in the world too :bowdown: :bowdown: :bowdown:
Brazil 2014![/QUOTE]
no you're not
ranked 19th in the latest fifa rankings :roll:
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=chosen_one6]On average, American football has only 11 minutes of action in 3 hours.[/QUOTE]
it really is fukking insane..........
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=tomtucker]it really is fukking insane..........[/QUOTE]
that isn't even true...not sure where he got that
one quarter is 15 minutes long with clock stops during most breaks
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=-p.tiddy-]slave breeding was an enormous industry in the US, in fact at one point I believe it was the single biggest money maker in the country...I don't think it was like that for Brazil
However many of the US slaves escaped south to Mexico and South America/Brazil and Jamaica as well as...many of the "black latinos" down there are ancestors of US slaves...many South American MLB players like Sammy Sosa and such have US slave ancestors. I am sure there are plenty of 'black Brazilians" like that as well...I am sure Anderson Silva has slave ancestors[/QUOTE]
LOL
Wtf dude do some internet research, Portugal was the biggest slave trader in the world and Brazil was its colony. For christ sake you think all black people in the South America are African American descendants? :facepalm
This is why most people hate americans, you dont know shit about what you are talking and act as if you know it all because America cant possibly be anything other than the best (in this case worse since we are talking about slavery here).
30% of Brazil's population in the 1800's was made of slaves. That's 1 million slaves in 1800. Do you know what was the american population in 1800? 5 million. So Brazil had as many slaves as 25% of the total american population in 1800.
Yea sure, our "black latinos" are descendants of african americans that came south :roll:
Re: If American Football wasn't called "football", would it be more popular...
[QUOTE=B-hoop]LOL
Wtf dude do some internet research, Portugal was the biggest slave trader in the world and Brazil was its colony. For christ sake you think all black people in the South America are African American descendants? :facepalm
This is why most people hate americans, you dont know shit about what you are talking and act as if you know it all because America cant possibly be the best (in this case worse since we are talking about slavery here).
30% of Brazil's population in the 1800's was made of slaves. That's 1 million slaves in 1800. Do you know what was the american population in 1800? 5 million. So Brazil had as many slaves as 25% of the total american population in 1800.
Yea sure, our "black latinos" are descendants of african americans that came south :roll:[/QUOTE]
I said "many escaped to the south..."...not all, read mfer shit
again, I don't think it was as big of an industry as the US...but I am sure many of the best athletes there can be traced to slave breeding if it was that huge