Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
Shaq is both strong, fat, and agile. He has been the most dominant big man ever.
Dwight is strong and lean, would he more dominant with some fat?
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
I think you'd be surprised at what shaq's body fat% is.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
[QUOTE=OneMoreSucka]I think you'd be surprised at what shaq's body fat% is.[/QUOTE]
Shaq said he is around 11-12%. I think more around 16-17%.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
[QUOTE=BirdOverrated]Shaq said he is around 11-12%. I think more around 16-17%.[/QUOTE]
Suns medical staff said he's at 12% this year. For Dwight to be as dominant as Shaq, he needs a certain thing called skill. Doesn't matter if you're a freak of nature, you need to be able to shoot, move with your feet, etc. Dwight is learning tho, but nowhere near as polished as he needs to be.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
I'll tell you one thing from experience. I've been at < 7% BF before and I've learned that my max baskeball performance is better when I've got a bit of gordo on me say around 10%. Not sure behind scientific explanation but rdiiculously low BF is only good for aesthetics.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
Yes, Oliver Miller > Hakeem.
Please, just stfu Borz you bring down my IQ every time I read your posts. It's not the body, it's how the guy uses his body.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
[QUOTE=Showtime]Yes, Oliver Miller > Hakeem.
Please, just stfu Borz you bring down my IQ every time I read your posts. It's not the body, [B]it's how the guy uses his body.[/B][/QUOTE]
^^^
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
just look at the big guys footwork... very good and he is like what 7' 1 or 2
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
Charles Barkley nuff said.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
Fat Shaq>>>>>>Skinny Shaq
[IMG]http://cache.daylife.com/imageserve/04NS2L4dNHeWp/340x.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0625/pg2_g_shaq_magic_412.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://www.thepostgame.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/shaquille-oneal.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_BboPdvtwT7Y/SXEeZyPBqDI/AAAAAAAAAGI/yeME7197i6Q/s320/shaq_lsu1a.jpg[/IMG]
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
Throughout most of his career he's been at the 10-13% mark. That's not a lot, considering the average is 14% for males.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
[QUOTE=BirdOverrated]
[IMG]http://assets.espn.go.com/photo/2008/0625/pg2_g_shaq_magic_412.jpg[/IMG]
[/QUOTE]
He looks like a taller, bulkier Carlton of the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air:roll:
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
[QUOTE=Auka]He looks like a taller, bulkier Carlton of the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air:roll:[/QUOTE]
He looks more like Carlton than Will.. :roll:
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
Yeah Shaq is taller than Dwight and has much better footwork. I also think people forget that Shaq was just as athletic as Dwight if not more gifted back in the day..
Shaq is no way 12%, you cant really see any definition, I'd say around 16% as opposed to dwight/lebrons 7/8%.
Re: Is Shaq Proof that Fat>Muscle? Would Dwight be more dominant with some fat?
We will see tomorrow when shaq goes off on dwight.