Klay Thompson - 0/7 3PT

[keep-itreal]

"b-b-but Warriors is stacked though!" :roll: :roll: :roll:

[aj1987]

"b-b-but Warriors is stacked though!" :roll: :roll: :roll:
How did he do in game 2?

[3ball]

"b-b-but Warriors is stacked though!" :roll: :roll: :roll:
don't be surprised.

if you take away the 3-point shot, what does Curry, Klay or the Warriors' have?

NOTHING - they're nothing without 3-pointers.

that's why the Bulls would beat them easily - the Bulls didn't rely on any singular aspect of the game to be great - they were just great BASKETBALL players.

[Lebron23]

Curry in the last 2 games is 0/0

[keep-itreal]

Curry in the last 2 games is 0/0

rent free

[aj1987]

don't be surprised.

if you take away the 3-point shot, what does Curry, Klay or the Warriors' have?

NOTHING - they're nothing without 3-pointers.

that's why the Bulls would beat them easily - the Bulls didn't rely on any singular aspect of the game to be great - they were just great BASKETBALL players.
73-9, bitch.

[kamil]

73-9, bitch.

6/6 > 2/7

Bitch.

[sportjames23]

don't be surprised.

if you take away the 3-point shot, what does Curry, Klay or the Warriors' have?

NOTHING - they're nothing without 3-pointers.

that's why the Bulls would beat them easily - the Bulls didn't rely on any singular aspect of the game to be great - they were just great BASKETBALL players.


http://media.giphy.com/media/Mp4hQy51LjY6A/giphy.gif

[aj1987]

6/6 > 2/7

Bitch.
:biggums:

Curry's not 2/7, you bald bitch.

[kamil]

:biggums:

Curry's not 2/7, you bald bitch.

Who are you calling bald? I'm not your idol.

2/7. We all know it hurts your feelings.

[aj1987]

Who are you calling bald? I'm not your idol.
MJ isn't my idol, baldy.


2/7. We all know it hurts your feelings.
Again, Curry is not 2/7, baldy.

[kamil]

^haha so salty

[aj1987]

^haha so salty
Bald meltdown. :roll:

[uber]

all of the starters had an "off" game and they still only lost by one point .. how exactly are they not stacked?

[D. Toretto]

don't be surprised.

if you take away the 3-point shot, what does Curry, Klay or the Warriors' have?

NOTHING - they're nothing without 3-pointers.

that's why the Bulls would beat them easily - the Bulls didn't rely on any singular aspect of the game to be great - they were just great BASKETBALL players.

They also have defense, great ball movement - unselfish players, good rebounding.
The Bulls wouldn't beat them easily. It would be a more than tough game.

[I know you are]

How did he do in game 2?
Role players often do better at home. Stars shine anywhere.

[LAZERUSS]

don't be surprised.

if you take away the 3-point shot, what does Curry, Klay or the Warriors' have?

NOTHING - they're nothing without 3-pointers.

that's why the Bulls would beat them easily - the Bulls didn't rely on any singular aspect of the game to be great - they were just great BASKETBALL players.

One of the dumbest comments ever on this board.

The Warriors KILL teams with the 3 point shot.

And don't give me this RIDICULOUS argument that a SHORTER line would make them easier to defend, either. A FULL 3 pt shot for Curry and company is a LAYUP. And Steph and Klay routinely shoot from MUCH farther back. Hell, last I looked Curry was shooting something like 50% from 30 feet.

Conversely, we all saw what happened to your Bulls when they moved the line back to the normal mark...they shot worse than Stevie Wonder in a wind-tunnel.

Remove the 3pt line altogether, and sure, the Bulls would probably win. BUT, use the current line, and they certainly wouldn't sweep GS. In fact, I give the Warriors a solid edge.

[KlayThompson21]

Klay had one ****ing bad game. All of you need to give him a break. :no:

[bdreason]

Klay has shown a few times now that he can't handle the pressure of being a #1 option. As a 2nd option he's really good though, and he plays good D most of the time as well.

[PP34Deuce]

Be physical with Klay and you can limit his offensive impact.

[riseagainst]

don't be surprised.

if you take away the 3-point shot, what does Curry, Klay or the Warriors' have?

NOTHING - they're nothing without 3-pointers.

that's why the Bulls would beat them easily - the Bulls didn't rely on any singular aspect of the game to be great - they were just great BASKETBALL players.

That's like saying if you take away the 2 point shot, dunks, points in the paint, the Bulls are nothing. Your logic is so flawed.

:facepalm