PDA

View Full Version : The Hero Ball Index



Kawhi
02-27-2016, 05:36 PM
In last year's conference semis, Lebron James, with just 1.5 seconds left and the game tied, hit a 21 foot shot from the corner to give the Cavaliers a victory over the Bulls, 86-84. Said James after the game:
I was supposed to take the ball out. I told coach, 'There's no way I'm taking the ball out unless I can shoot it over the backboard and go in.' So I told him to have somebody else take the ball out, give me the ball and everybody get out the way.
In clutch situations, teams tend to run their offense through their stars (or in Lebron's case, the star runs the offense). At its best, you get iconic moments like Michael Jordan's game winner in the '98 Finals and Lebron's aforementioned heroics. At its worst, you get low efficiency desperation, clock draining iso play, and heavily contested, off the mark mid-range jumpers (sarcastically referred to as "hero ball").

Earlier this season, I launched clutch shooting reports. This interactive report uses win probability to classify shots into four basic categories: garbage time, "normal" basketball, clutch, and "double" clutch. That fourth category, double clutch, represent the top 1% of shots in terms of potential impact on a team's chances of victory. The following chart summarizes these four phases as a function of score difference and time remaining.

https://4.bp.blogspot.com/-gguqNj9MzIA/VspO1PxilII/AAAAAAAABVw/g-U8VdAz2AA/s640/clutch_bucket.png

For double clutch situations (that splotch of red on the right), shot attempts are more concentrated among a handful of a team's key starters. At the other end, garbage time, shot distribution is much more spread out. Teams put their bench players on the court, and, in general, starters and bench warmers alike are more prone to chuck it when the stakes are low.

Is there a way to quantify this shift in shot distribution? If so, we can also quantify which teams are most prone to "hero ball" - the tendency to run the offense through a single player (or players) when the stakes are the highest.

I Dream of Gini
There are a multitude of ways to quantify how equally, or unequally, a resource is shared among a group of people. The most common of these is the Gini coefficient, and its most frequent use is to measure income inequality among nations. A Gini coefficient scales from 0 to 1, with a greater coefficient implying greater inequality. A nation in which each citizen had the exact same income would have a Gini coefficient of 0. A nation in which a single individual hoarded all the wealth would have a Gini coefficient of 1.

If, instead of income, we apply the Gini coefficient to player shot attempts, we get the following average Gini values for each of the four phases:

Phase Average Gini
Garbage Time 0.263
Normal Basketball 0.302
Clutch 0.343
Double Clutch 0.524
All Shots 0.292

For all shots, NBA teams spread the wealth about as well as Denmark, with a Gini coefficient of 0.292. Garbage time is the most egalitarian, with a Norwegian coefficient of 0.263. But for the biggest shots, things go from Nordic to tinpot. Double clutch shots have a Gini coefficient of 0.524, comparable to that of Guatemala's. A technical note: the Gini coefficient used here is the weighted version, where the weight used is minutes played (this prevents a player with just 15 minutes played over a season from skewing the overall Gini coefficient).

Here is a breakdown, by team, of the Gini coefficient for double clutch attempts.

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-XrOVp5fzY6c/VtHKGFScMTI/AAAAAAAABW0/OPBpLUXJKNs/s640/heroball.png

Cleveland sits atop the hero ball index. 72% of "double clutch" shot attempts have been taken by a single player, Lebron James. The next two teams on the list, Miami and Oklahoma City, are similar in that two stars dominate in crunch time. For Miami, it is Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade, with 34% and 49% of double clutch attempts, respectively. As one would expect, for the Thunder, it's Russell Westbrook and Kevin Durant, with 39% and 48% of attempts.

The Memphis Grizzlies are the "not it" team this year. No player on the Grizzlies accounts for more than 20% of double clutch shot attempts.

Here are double clutch shot attempts by player for the Cavaliers:
https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-R1fh4kAI8vY/VtHEsdn7fdI/AAAAAAAABWg/kMZN7k6tELY/s640/CLE_dbl.png

"Everybody get out the way" indeed.

The table below has Gini coefficients by team for the past seven seasons. The 2011-12 Oklahoma City Thunder have the highest "Hero Ball Index" over that time period. Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook accounted for 95% of the team's double clutch shot attempts, leading to a Gini coefficient of 0.749. In fact, five of the top eight spots on the hero ball index belong to the Thunder.

http://www.inpredictable.com/2016/02/the-hero-ball-index.html

Kawhi
02-27-2016, 05:37 PM
TLDR: Hero ball gets you nowhere.

warriorfan
02-27-2016, 05:39 PM
TLDR: Hero ball gets you nowhere.

Unless you are Curry

3ball
02-27-2016, 06:18 PM
.
Here's a list of all the play-types listed on NBA.com, with the percentile rank that 1.00 PPP equates to in each category (the lower the percentile rank, the more efficient the play - as you can see, 1.00 PPP translates to the 65.2 percentile for "off-screen", and the 81.5 percentile for "isolations", so "off-screen" is more efficient):


1) Cut (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/cut/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 19.2 percentile

2) Roll man on screen-rolls (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/roll-man/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 46.1 percentile

3) Off-screen (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/off-screen/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 65.2 percentile

4) Spot-ups (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/spot-up/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 63.3 percentile

5) Hand-offs (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/hand-off/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 71.4 percentile

6) Isolations (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/isolation/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 81.5 percentile

7) Post-ups (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/post-up/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive): 86.2 percentile

8) Ballhandler on screen-rolls (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/ball-handler/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 94.6 percentile



HERE'S HOW THIS RELATES TO CURRY'S SUPERIORITY ON OFFENSE

The least efficient play shown above (ballhandler on screen rolls) constitutes 20-25% of the offense for top wings like Lebron, with another 20-25% coming from similarly low efficient isolations.. Essentially, the top wing players in the league use low efficiency ball-dominance over 50% of the time.

Point guards ALSO use the least efficient options - they're the ballhandler on screen rolls for 40% to 60% of their offense.

But the exception is Steph Curry.. He's the ballhandler on screen-rolls for only 24.2% of his offense and only isolates 10% of the time.. He simply employs the higher efficiency OFF-BALL options more often than his peers.. This is contributes to his superior efficiency.

His off-ball offense not only makes him more efficeint, but this gives teammates more opportunity/time with the ball to be comfortable and play their game..

Unlike Lebron, teammates aren't starved of the ball and don't have to subjugate their game to the whim of the #1 option.. Ultimately, Curry is better because his off-ball play makes him more efficient, while giving his team more capacity to reach a higher level of teamwork and superior play.

Uncle Drew
02-27-2016, 06:20 PM
.
Here's a list of all the play-types listed on NBA.com, with the percentile rank that 1.00 PPP equates to in each category (the lower the percentile rank, the more efficient the play - as you can see, 1.00 PPP translates to the 65.2 percentile for "off-screen", and the 81.5 percentile for "isolations", so "off-screen" is more efficient):


1) Cut (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/cut/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 19.2 percentile

2) Roll man on screen-rolls (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/roll-man/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 46.1 percentile

3) Off-screen (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/off-screen/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 65.2 percentile

4) Spot-ups (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/spot-up/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 63.3 percentile

5) Hand-offs (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/hand-off/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 71.4 percentile

6) Isolations (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/isolation/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 81.5 percentile

7) Post-ups (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/post-up/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive): 86.2 percentile

8) Ballhandler on screen-rolls (http://stats.nba.com/playtype/#!/ball-handler/?dir=1&PT=player&OD=offensive&sort=Points): 94.6 percentile



HERE'S HOW THIS RELATES TO CURRY'S SUPERIORITY ON OFFENSE

The least efficient play shown above (ballhandler on screen rolls) constitutes 20-25% of the offense for top wings like Lebron, with another 20-25% coming from similarly low efficient isolations.. Essentially, the top wing players in the league use low efficiency ball-dominance over 50% of the time.

Point guards ALSO use the least efficient options - they're the ballhandler on screen rolls for 40% to 60% of their offense.

But the exception is Steph Curry.. He's the ballhandler on screen-rolls for only 24.2% of his offense and only isolates 10% of the time.. He simply employs the higher efficiency OFF-BALL options more often than his peers.. This is contributes to his superior efficiency.

His off-ball offense not only makes him more efficeint, but this gives teammates more opportunity/time with the ball to be comfortable and play their game..

Unlike Lebron, teammates aren't starved of the ball and don't have to subjugate their game to the whim of the #1 option.. Ultimately, Curry is better because his off-ball play makes him more efficient, while giving his team more capacity to reach a higher level of teamwork and superior play.
https://media.giphy.com/media/l4Ki2obCyAQS5WhFe/giphy.gif

Dresta
02-27-2016, 06:26 PM
It'd be useful if they also posted the team's records in close games.

3ball
02-27-2016, 06:26 PM
It's statistical fact (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=385841) that Lebron reduces his teammates' APG (playmaking), while increasing their assisted rate (play-finishing)... Therefore, it's statistical fact that Lebron turns teammates from playmakers into play-finishers.

Unfortunately, by reducing teammates to play-finishers, Lebron promotes a brand of basketball that can't succeed against the best playoff teams, who invariably play a superior brand of basketball.. Guys like Patty Mills and Boris Diaw are tasked with MAKING PLAYS for the Spurs - they aren't just play-finishers like Shumpert and JR Smith (who are more talented).

Furthermore, Lebron's teammates' predictable play-finishing roles don't work against the best playoff teams - since teammates are playing undercapacity, the TEAM plays undercapacity/underperforms (i.e. losing as the favorite in 2009 ECF, 2010 ECSF, and 2011 Finals, or losing when it was 50/50 - 2014 Finals) (http://www.nj.com/knicks/index.ssf/2014/06/nba_finals_2014_experts_predict_whether_the_heat_o r_spurs_will_come_out_on_top_in_the_finals_rematch .html).

That's the difference between 2/6 and 6/6.. MJ got the most out of his teammates (elevates teammates), while Lebron doesn't (he turns them into play-finishers, leading to team underperformance).

Now the question is WHY SPECIFICALLY does Lebron turn teammates into play-finishers?.. The reason is twofold (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showpost.php?p=12056301&postcount=60).