Bigger collapse, Packers in Seattle or the 2013 Spurs in Game 6?

[SouBeachTalents]

Both improbable comebacks that go differently 99 times out of 100. Which collapse was more surprising to you?

[Doranku]

Packers easily bigger collapse. They dominated the entire game and then gave up 15 points in 44 seconds.

5 point comebacks with ~30 seconds left happen all the time in basketball.

[1987_Lakers]

Seattle was down 19-7 with 2:30 minutes left in the game with 1 timeout left, do you have any idea how unlikely it is for a team to come back and win under those circumstances?

[tpols]

Definitely Packers.. To put it in basketball terms it would be like being down 10+ with under 30 seconds. Like some Reggie Miller 8 points in 10 seconds shit.

[navy]

Packers.
Gave up easy touchdowns.
Got an interception and didnt run it back.
Failed on the easy onside kick.
Let them score on hail mary 2 point conversion.
Chose tails instead of heads

[Beastmode88]

Definitely Packers.. To put it in basketball terms it would be like being down 10+ with under 30 seconds. Like some Reggie Miller 8 points in 10 seconds shit.

Like what tmac did to the spurs... :lol :lol :lol

[Real14]

1999 EQF Knicks heat game 5

[tpols]

Like what tmac did to the spurs... :lol :lol :lol
Yea pretty much lol.. But if tmac did that in a game 7 he'd have a totally different image and legacy

[T_L_P]

I've got to watch the highlights of this NFL game if it was really this bad. :oldlol:

[tpols]

I've got to watch the highlights of this NFL game if it was really this bad. :oldlol:
Highlights don't even do it justice.. Seattle just seemed so dead.. Their offense didn't score a single point until 2:09 in the 4th. It was the most amazing turnaround ever.