View Full Version : Why did the Bulls let Nate Robinson go?
keep-itreal
09-06-2014, 06:08 AM
Why didn't they keep him? He was so good he carried the team and beat the nets in the playoffs
JohnFreeman
09-06-2014, 06:09 AM
$$$$$$
andremiller07
09-06-2014, 06:09 AM
Why did the Nuggets sign him?
kurple
09-06-2014, 08:56 AM
$$$$$$
because he's making so much in denver?
2-3 mill a year. for one more year (two total)
Crystallas
09-06-2014, 08:57 AM
They thought Derrick was going to be healthy. That's it, nothing more.
kurple
09-06-2014, 08:58 AM
Why did the Nuggets sign him?
because andre miller was a shell of his old self. and almost singlehandedly lost us the series against GSW with his pathetic defense on curry
well that might be a bit too harsh. but guy was beyond a liability on the defesive end
32MJ32
09-06-2014, 09:39 AM
He's not very good?
Nate can create shots for himself and on a good day, make 7 outta 10. On a bad day, 3 outta 10. He has as many good days as bad days. He also has a nice 3 point shot when left open and.. that's about it.
He does nothing else at an even above-average level. He's a scoring guard who's not an elite or even All-Star level scorer. And I'd argue he's in the in the bottom 5% of defenders for his position.
It's no coincidence that he's been on 6 teams in 9 years.
Guys like him and Nick Young seem to blind people with their 16-17ppg averages. Dig a little deeper and you'll find they shoot 43% and don't do sh!t else to help their teams win
robert de niro
09-06-2014, 09:53 AM
he just didn't measure up to the rest of the team
nathanjizzle
09-06-2014, 11:00 AM
the same reason why he bounces around so much. hes not a good locker room guy. he doesnt know when to to make the pass or when to shoot.
postmupndunkit
09-06-2014, 12:50 PM
the same reason why he bounces around so much. hes not a good locker room guy. he doesnt know when to to make the pass or when to shoot.
:facepalm
He is ONE DIMENSIONAL and is paid to CHUCK. Nate is a streaky shooting entertaining pg/sg.
Sure wish we would of kept him, but our acquisition of Aaron Brooks is going unnoticed by a lot of people. Brooks will be a game changer and is a starting pointguard in this league.
inclinerator
09-06-2014, 02:42 PM
he was actually good for the bulls since nobody could create their own shot
andremiller07
09-06-2014, 06:58 PM
because andre miller was a shell of his old self. and almost singlehandedly lost us the series against GSW with his pathetic defense on curry
well that might be a bit too harsh. but guy was beyond a liability on the defesive end
Yeah cause Faried didn't get shat on and neither did McGee, had nothing to do with Dre Curry was a man possessed and Iggy was giving away game plans. Robinson was a crap signing considering they already had a small scoring guard in Ty. It's just like the JJ Hickson signing what's the point?
poido123
09-06-2014, 07:29 PM
They thought Derrick was going to be healthy. That's it, nothing more.
This.
Historically, Bulls brass will spend money in years they think they will win a championship.
They might be thrifty, but they run a business well and if I was an owner, I'd only spend in years I'm contending also.
Can we stop overrating Nate. He is a good spark off the bench, nothing more.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.